Wednesday, February 3rd
10:1 for the Victorian method
We had Aulchenko here a year a go or so – now here comes his new paper Predicting human height by Victorian and genomic methods
In a population-based study of 5748 people, we find that a 54-loci genomic profile explained 4–6% of the sex- and age-adjusted height variance, and had limited ability to discriminate tall/short people, as characterized by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). In a family-based study of 550 people, with both parents having height measurements, we find that the Galtonian mid-parental prediction method explained 40% of the sex- and age-adjusted height variance.
yea, yea.
Related Posts: A new analysis method for blood doping, Will the Data Deluge Make the Scientific Method Obsolete?, What could have been learned from linkage studies