But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil
Wednesday, February 3rd

10:1 for the Victorian method

We had Aulchenko here a year a go or so – now here comes his new paper Predicting human height by Victorian and genomic methods

In a population-based study of 5748 people, we find that a 54-loci genomic profile explained 4–6% of the sex- and age-adjusted height variance, and had limited ability to discriminate tall/short people, as characterized by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). In a family-based study of 550 people, with both parents having height measurements, we find that the Galtonian mid-parental prediction method explained 40% of the sex- and age-adjusted height variance.

yea, yea.

Related Posts: A new analysis method for blood doping, Will the Data Deluge Make the Scientific Method Obsolete?, What could have been learned from linkage studies
Categories: Genetics + Biology
Keywords:
Trackback: http://www.wjst.de/blog/2010/02/03/101-for-the-victorian-method/


Leave a Reply