Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Allergy, Philosophy

Broken feedback loops

22.02.2007 admin

Salamander Candy has an interesting essay about Sir Karl Popper’s demarcation of science

The most informative and useful delineation between those pursuits understood as scientific, such as astronomy, and those of the pseudo-sciences, such as astrology, is that science integrates positive and negative feedback loops. These feedback loops are based on critical analysis, empirical testing, and reformulation of falsifiable statements. This process serves to maximize the accumulation of accurate statements and minimize the accumulation of erroneous statements within an integrated system of statements which describe the physical universe. In other words, the primary function of science, and the thing that makes it different from pseudo-science, is constructive self-criticism. Karl Popper, in his essay “Science: Conjectures and Refutations” (1963), claims that, “…the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability.”

This is a really nice account on the scientific theory that get nowadays more and more corrupted in daily practice (at least in biomedical research). For example there are currently 30-50 allergy research papers every day; many of these miss recent and important papers. Correct me if I am wrong but most biomedical research is accumulating only facts but not knowledge. The discussion section of many papers follow the boring outline — we found- — others found — some strengths and weaknesses of our research — some strengths and weaknesses of other research — further research required what I consider broken feedback loops. In my experience only half of the authors will respond to email enquiries regarding their articles.
It was therefore a real pleasure to see a new study on antibiotics and allergy with a true discussion wieghting pro and con arguments that was more worth than a meta-analysis on the same topic.

Related posts: A hitch in the glitch of the switch | déjà-vu | Prevention of fraud | Science of course and effective too | Open peer review failed |

Asthma + AllergyScience + Philosophiebiomedical_sciencenegative_feedback_loopspseudo_scienceself_criticismsir_karl_poppertheoretical_account

Post navigation

Previous PostAt its heartNext PostComputer names, sequencer names, freezer names
Disclaimer

Tweets

Most clicked

  • Eine Grenze zu setzen dem unendlichen Irrtum
    Galilei: Was geschieht? Federzoni: Die Nadel schwimmt! Heiliger Aristoteles, sie haben ihn niemals überprüft! Sie lachen. Galilei: Eine Hauptursache der Armut in den Wissenschaften ist meist eingebildeter Reichtum. Es ist nicht ihr Ziel, der unendlichen...
  • Der chinesische Menschenversuch
    This content has restricted access, please type the password below and get access.
  • How it is going, how it started – asthma genome wide scans
    Here are the most recent GWAS data for asthma – not identical peaks but quite similar How it is going 2021 PMC5901974 big.stats.ox.ac.uk pheweb.sph.umich.edu r2.finngen.fi www.ebi.ac.uk How it started: 1996-1998 third linkage scan (my thesis)...
  • Nature Genetics corrupted by 23andme
    This content has restricted access, please type the password below and get access. Related posts: Drop the last 3 nature genetics volumes from the libraries | Timeline asthma / allergy genetics | Parascience in nature...
  • A passion for precision
    The title is borrowed from  the opening Lecture of Theodor Hänsch on July, 7th, 2006 at the The Euroscience Open Forum in Munich and the Nobel lecture on December 8, 2005 [video] – one of...
  • Zur Geschichte der Heilpraktiker
    Der im letzten Jahr verstorbene und nicht unumstrittene Münchner Toxikologie Daunderer schrieb auf seiner toxcenter Webseite über das Heilpraktikerwesen als ungeliebtes Hitlererbe: Kritiker halten die Existenz des Heilpraktikerberufs für einen Betriebsunfall der deutschen Geschichte. … Weil Deutschland...
  • Does a healthy worker effect explain the allergy protection” at Bavarian farms?
    Unfortunately most studies in the farming environment do not report the prevalence of parental history. Neither did they report the effect size of parental  genetic risk in the farming population. This is, however, a critical...
  • LIMIT TO 5! What about a maximum of 5 papers per year per scientist?
    Undoubtly, there is an avalanche of poor research – as the Chronicle wrote last June, “we must stop the avalanche of low-quality research” the amount of redundant, inconsequential, and outright poor research has swelled in...
  • Die Ethik von Facebook
    Das mangelnde Bewusstsein von Facebook in ethischen Fragen war das immer wiederkehrende Problem von Cambridge Analytics bis zum Filterstream. Und nun finanziert Facebook plötzlich ein Ethik-Institut? Niemand redet mehr über die Ethik von Facebook sondern darüber...
  • Nylenna-Simonsen-Chalmers Misconduct Diagram
    The Lancet (10 June 2006, p 1882) had one of the best descriptions of scientific misconduct that I have ever seen (yes, I am also admiring Geoffrey Rose). The authors argue that our current view...
  • Cognitive bias codex
    I am sure, I wrote or talked about it before, but cannot find it. So here again –  a link to the cognitive bias codex plot of Terry Heick from https://www.teachthought.com (that is itself based on...
  • Das Problem des deutschen Ethikrates
    Das Problem des Ethikrates? Der Rat nimmt Stellung zu allen möglichen und unmöglichen Themen, kann aber meist die Fakten in der kurzen Beratungszeit nicht einordnen. Oder aber wertet sie mit nicht nachvollziehbaren Kriterien. Das war...

RSS Special Collections

Climate & Crisis

Genome & Editing

Daten & Schutz

Scientific Integrity

Adelsberger papers

Schweitzer papers

Allergy [RSS]

Genetics [RSS]

Joke [RSS]

One World [RSS]

Philosophy [RSS]

Software [RSS]

Theology [RSS]

Video [RSS]

Vitamin D [RSS]

SEARCH

Broken feedback loops
https://www.wjst.de/blog/sciencesurf/2007/02/broken-feedback-loops/
(c) Science Surf, Matthias Wjst
published 22.02.2007, accessed 30.06.2022