The Gangelt Study

6.5.2020  update 2/3

Two fun facts – the person in table 1 was probably so drunken that s/he does not even remember carnival ;-)
And the press briefing reporter did not understand the difference of essay and assay :-)
Drosten about the study in his podcast “a little bit too high”, “would have analyzed in a different way”, “no raw data” …
Berens about the wrong confidence interval …
Streeck mixes “CFR” and “IFR” at 3:03 …
lockdown to control until vaccine “not feasible” 22:27  and argues for “viral low dose”

Sahm / FAZ complained about the confidence interval.

The current IFR in the USA is not 0.36% but 1.3% (95% CI: 0.6% to 2.1%) with county-specific rates varied from 0.5% to 3.6% according to Basu 2020. With  a correct figure of 11 deaths out of 15/100 * 12.000 in Gangelt, the IFR is 0,61% and compatible with the lower end of the US distribution,