More PubPeer Pearls

It’s always interesting if we can find a discussion under a PubPeer article with more than 3 comments. Elisabeth Bik collected some of these interesting #PubPeer Pearls at Twitter while I am starting a new collection here.

The longest thread that I remember is this one with 290 comments around a retracted article while my most appreciated PubPeer authoris Guillaume Cabanac who seems to be a real person presenting there the most interesting findings like this one

https://pubpeer.com/publications/736F9ED5BAA2EB71278368C6F25E02

this

https://pubpeer.com/publications/96083B9DE6614C0262EA0C8A70161B

this

https://pubpeer.com/publications/1CB7956A0BC411687AAC6C8B6FB4B0

this

https://pubpeer.com/publications/C3CA5B980C18BF2871E4235F9055CA#3

this

https://pubpeer.com/publications/FC000741FA2BC520ED94BDA62EF2FA

and well

corrections that introduced new errors [1]