{"id":10640,"date":"2018-10-27T12:44:55","date_gmt":"2018-10-27T11:44:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/?p=10640"},"modified":"2018-10-27T12:46:48","modified_gmt":"2018-10-27T11:46:48","slug":"retractions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2018\/10\/retractions\/","title":{"rendered":"Retractions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/science.sciencemag.org\/content\/362\/6413\/390.full\">Science Magazine<\/a> reports a collaboration with Retraction Watch<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A disturbingly large portion of papers\u2014about 2%\u2014contain \u201cproblematic\u201d scientific images that experts readily identified as deliberately manipulated, according to a study of 20,000 papers published in <em>mBio<\/em> in 2016 by Elisabeth Bik of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, and colleagues. What&#8217;s more, our analysis showed that most of the 12,000 journals recorded in Clarivate&#8217;s widely used Web of Science database of scientific articles have not reported a single retraction since 2003.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Most journals that I am reading, are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2018\/04\/nature-genetics-corrupted-by-23andme\/\">never retracting a paper<\/a>. So the whole Science statistics are flawed.<\/p>\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"bottom-note\">\n  <span class=\"mod1\">CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 04.05.2026<\/span>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Science Magazine reports a collaboration with Retraction Watch A disturbingly large portion of papers\u2014about 2%\u2014contain \u201cproblematic\u201d scientific images that experts readily identified as deliberately manipulated, according to a study of 20,000 papers published in mBio in 2016 by Elisabeth Bik of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, and colleagues. What&#8217;s more, our analysis showed that &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2018\/10\/retractions\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Retractions<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophy-of-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10640"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10640\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10643,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10640\/revisions\/10643"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}