{"id":13591,"date":"2019-10-06T12:57:19","date_gmt":"2019-10-06T12:57:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/?p=13591"},"modified":"2023-09-05T19:21:26","modified_gmt":"2023-09-05T17:21:26","slug":"does-a-healthy-worker-effect-explain-the-allergy-protection-at-bavarian-farms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2019\/10\/does-a-healthy-worker-effect-explain-the-allergy-protection-at-bavarian-farms\/","title":{"rendered":"Does a healthy worker effect explain the allergy protection&#8221; at Bavarian farms?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Unfortunately most studies in the farming environment do not report the prevalence of parental history. Neither did they report the effect size of parental\u00a0 genetic risk in the farming population. This is, however, a critical issue as the so called healthy worker effect (HEW) may be a rather trivial explanation of the results.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Specifically, it is a\u00a0<a title=\"Sampling bias\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sampling_bias\">sampling bias<\/a>: the kind of subjects that voluntarily enroll in a\u00a0<a title=\"Clinical trial\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Clinical_trial\">clinical trial<\/a> and actually follow the experimental regimen are not representative of the general population. They can be expected, on average, to be healthier as they are concerned for their health [or as ill people already dropped out]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>At least <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/10051699\">Braun-Fahrl\u00e4nder 1999<\/a> reported that allergic parents were seen much less at farms.\u00a0 Consecutively history of allergy at farms <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jacionline.org\/article\/S0091-6749(08)01133-0\/pdf\">is no more a risk factor<\/a> as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/1520004\">it is otherwise reduced compared to the general population<\/a> &#8211; no diseased parent, no increased risk.\u00a0 So lets see if there are\u00a0 any further studies in adults?<\/p>\n<p>I know of three studies (plus a review <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/17872490\">Le Moual N 2008)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.atsjournals.org\/doi\/full\/10.1164\/ajrccm.164.10.2103137\">Leynaert 2001<\/a> showed only a slightly reduced prevalence of &#8220;allergy&#8221; (39.1% vs 41.5%, NS). Her table 4 is most interesting. The association started only after year 1960 which points towards severe misclassification as far as the analysis is not stratified by year of birth.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/12463312\">Remes 2002<\/a> showed a dose dependent effect decline between farming (36.2%) and controls (31.6%, P=0.075),<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/16751000\">Perkin 2006<\/a> also found some significant lower prevalence in farmers 47.3% versus 57.7%, P&lt;0.001. HWE is therefore likely.<\/p>\n<p>I found further six studies (<a href=\"https:\/\/econpapers.repec.org\/article\/eeesocmed\/v_3a38_3ay_3a1994_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a147-151.htm\">Thelin 1994<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/16360568\/\">Braback 2006<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S0012369215499076\">Chenard 2007<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/22069061\/\">Thaon 2011<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/46414367_The_cohort_of_young_Danish_farmers_-_A_longitudinal_study_of_the_health_effects_of_farming_exposure\">Elholm 2013<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00420-015-1047-9\">Spierenburg 2015<\/a>) that examined in detail a possible relationship of HWE, allergy and farming.\u00a0Unfortunately the examination period in five of these studies is too short to make any conclusion while <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/16360568\">Braback 2006<\/a> seems to be the only reliable study.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_13611\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-13611\" style=\"width: 376px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/screen-7.png\" data-rel=\"key-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-13611\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/screen-7.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"376\" height=\"358\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/screen-7.png 710w, https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/screen-7-620x590.png 620w, https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/screen-7-525x500.png 525w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 376px) 100vw, 376px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-13611\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/16360568\">Braback 2006<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>From this study, we can safely conclude, that there is a significant HWE.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Addendum 22 Nov 2019<\/span><\/p>\n<p>It seems that I missed some papers on HWE and farming.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007%2Fs10654-019-00491-9\">Timm 2019<\/a> is a hard to understand cluttered 3 generation study of unclear asthma\u00a0 type. Point estimates of parental asthma on farm upbringing are not really a measure of HWE &#8211; shuffling exposure and outcome distorts temporality. In contrast to the interpretation of the authors, I see a clear effect if both parents are born on a farm and one parent has asthma. The RR drops here to 0.33 that their child will be raised on a farm.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Bildschirmfoto-2022-06-01-um-15.43.20.jpg\" rel=\"key\" data-rel=\"key-image-1\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-19977 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Bildschirmfoto-2022-06-01-um-15.43.20-620x171.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"620\" height=\"171\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Bildschirmfoto-2022-06-01-um-15.43.20-620x171.jpg 620w, https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Bildschirmfoto-2022-06-01-um-15.43.20-768x212.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Bildschirmfoto-2022-06-01-um-15.43.20-1536x424.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Bildschirmfoto-2022-06-01-um-15.43.20.jpg 1797w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 620px) 100vw, 620px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/erj.ersjournals.com\/content\/13\/1\/187\">Vogelzang 1999<\/a>: 400 pig farmers, X-sectional point estimates, not a\u00a0 real HWE study, although HWE offered as explanation.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Health-based selection of nonasthmatics for pig farming, which tends to mask a work-related hazard for asthma, is offered as an explanation for these results.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.indexcopernicus.com\/search\/article?articleId=2101331\">Eduard 2015<\/a>: compares asthma prevalence of 313 Danish farm children to their 518 sibs (which is identical) but useless, as affected parents would basically dropout all children.<\/p>\n<p>There is even a second comparison of Norwegian farmers with a clear effect. Instead of comparing the early retired farmers with their respective age cohort they invented a c complicated quantile logitic regression in 4 year intervals. Detailed model parameter and significance levels are missing.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-20324\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Bildschirmfoto-2022-08-02-um-15.33.28.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"598\" height=\"451\" \/><\/p>\n<p>At least the conclusion was<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 3\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<blockquote>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 3\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p>A healthy survivor selection was observed in Norwegian farmers, but it was too small to fully explain the reduced risk of asthma observed in this population. A strong selection effect was observed among farmers who had changed production type<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>will be <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2022\/07\/parental-allergy-history-at-farms\/\">continued&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"bottom-note\">\n  <span class=\"mod1\">CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 27.04.2026<\/span>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Unfortunately most studies in the farming environment do not report the prevalence of parental history. Neither did they report the effect size of parental\u00a0 genetic risk in the farming population. This is, however, a critical issue as the so called healthy worker effect (HEW) may be a rather trivial explanation of the results. Specifically, it &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2019\/10\/does-a-healthy-worker-effect-explain-the-allergy-protection-at-bavarian-farms\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Does a healthy worker effect explain the allergy protection&#8221; at Bavarian farms?<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,2],"tags":[1096,3849,3847,3848,2627],"class_list":["post-13591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-asthma-allergy","category-genetics-biology","tag-farming","tag-healthy-worker-effect","tag-migration","tag-parents","tag-selection"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13591"}],"version-history":[{"count":26,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13591\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22632,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13591\/revisions\/22632"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}