{"id":15298,"date":"2020-03-07T07:23:35","date_gmt":"2020-03-07T07:23:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/?p=15298"},"modified":"2021-02-21T11:36:54","modified_gmt":"2021-02-21T11:36:54","slug":"new-england-journal-of-medicine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2020\/03\/new-england-journal-of-medicine\/","title":{"rendered":"New England Journal of Medicine Retractions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Retraction Watch <a href=\"https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/2020\/01\/30\/nejm-paper-retracted-for-inaccuracies-in-the-analytic-database-and-data-analyses\/\">says on Jan 30, 2020<\/a> that<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Until yesterday the New England Journal of Medicine had retracted only 24 papers. Now that <a href=\"http:\/\/retractiondatabase.org\/RetractionSearch.aspx#?jou%3dThe%2bNew%2bEngland%2bJournal%2bof%2bMedicine\">tally is 25<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>While the retracted paper has been cited 190 times, here are inaccuracies in another <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1056\/NEJMoa020057\">NEJM paper<\/a> that has been cited 1961 times.<\/p>\n<p>Full details are at <a href=\"https:\/\/pubpeer.com\/publications\/89A06C88F3B80BA5264531B74BAF67\">PubPeer<\/a>.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_15307\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-15307\" style=\"width: 130px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2020\/03\/new-england-journal-of-medicine\/10-1056nejmoa020057fig2c\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-15307\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-15307\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/10.1056NEJMoa020057Fig2C.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"130\" height=\"138\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/10.1056NEJMoa020057Fig2C.png 500w, https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/10.1056NEJMoa020057Fig2C-470x500.png 470w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 130px) 100vw, 130px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-15307\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FIG 2C<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_15308\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-15308\" style=\"width: 99px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2020\/03\/new-england-journal-of-medicine\/10-1056nejmoa020057fig1a\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-15308\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-15308\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/10.1056NEJMoa020057Fig1A.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"99\" height=\"137\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/10.1056NEJMoa020057Fig1A.png 500w, https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/10.1056NEJMoa020057Fig1A-362x500.png 362w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 99px) 100vw, 99px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-15308\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FIG 1A<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Is it justified to speak of a &#8220;protective&#8221; effect just by a\u00a0 negative association?<\/p>\n<p>In addition to the problems with the math, I don&#8217;t get the point &#8211; farming should be leading to a generally reduced capacity for numerous pleiotropic cytokines?<\/p>\n<p>There are even reports that<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/28084419\"> LPS induces TH2 dependent senstization<\/a> which is exactly the opposite of what this paper wants us to believe by some cryptic smoother applied to\u00a0 a heterogenous population.<\/p>\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"bottom-note\">\n  <span class=\"mod1\">CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 14.04.2026<\/span>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Retraction Watch says on Jan 30, 2020 that Until yesterday the New England Journal of Medicine had retracted only 24 papers. Now that tally is 25. While the retracted paper has been cited 190 times, here are inaccuracies in another NEJM paper that has been cited 1961 times. Full details are at PubPeer. Is it &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2020\/03\/new-england-journal-of-medicine\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">New England Journal of Medicine Retractions<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,2],"tags":[3367,3376,3374,3370,3375,3372,3369,3377,3373,3380,3379,3368,3381,3371,3163],"class_list":["post-15298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-asthma-allergy","category-genetics-biology","tag-braun-fahrlander","tag-bufe","tag-carr","tag-eder","tag-gerlach","tag-grize","tag-herz","tag-lauener","tag-masich","tag-nowak","tag-renz","tag-riedler","tag-schierl","tag-waser","tag-von-mutius"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15298"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15298\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18130,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15298\/revisions\/18130"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}