{"id":1699,"date":"2008-09-11T12:11:18","date_gmt":"2008-09-11T10:11:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/?p=1699"},"modified":"2008-09-14T11:43:15","modified_gmt":"2008-09-14T09:43:15","slug":"ormdl3-more-inconsistencies-in-the-nature-paper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2008\/09\/ormdl3-more-inconsistencies-in-the-nature-paper\/","title":{"rendered":"ORMDL3 &#8211; more inconsistencies in the Nature paper"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It seems that CEA just published <a href=\"http:\/\/www3.interscience.wiley.com\/journal\/121388431\/abstract?CRETRY=1&#038;SRETRY=0\">my rather critical view of the recent ORMDL3 association<\/a> paper. My letter had been first submitted to &#8220;Nature&#8221; but rejected after review.<br \/>\nA rebuttal seemed to be necessary as the authors repeatedly highlight ORMDL3 as a new asthma gene &#8211; in the printed Nature paper, in the Nature podcast and in the accompanying press releases. They even continue with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/18769193?ordinalpos=1&#038;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum\">reviews<\/a> saying that<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nCompletion of the human genome sequence and the advent of genome-wide association studies have resulted in the identification of two novel asthma susceptibility genes, ORMDL3 and CHI3L1, in the past year.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nBesides all the facts mentioned in my CEA letter, there even more inconsistencies like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/2007\/08\/13\/blink-plink\/\">unreported population stratification<\/a> and unreported relationship in the German case-control study. I even believe that their figure 3 could not have been produced by the available data. During our recent correspondence the authors insisted that<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nour figure 3 contained all the information in Dr Wijst&#8217;s figure, with the exception that our LD map was drawn from the subjects and markers in our study and not a limited number of individuals in a public database.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So lets have a look at a (partially cropped and) zoomed version of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v448\/n7152\/fig_tab\/nature06014_F3.html\">their original figure 3a<\/a>.<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/09\/origfig.png\" data-rel=\"key-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/09\/origfig.png\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"195\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1700\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nWhen plotting their data in the online deposit it turns out that the authors did not have such a high SNP coverage to produce such a high resolution figure.<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/09\/expectedfig.png\" data-rel=\"key-image-1\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/09\/expectedfig.png\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"114\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1701\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nThe redrawn map is clearly different from the printed version while the reason for this inconsistency is unclear. At least the Nature editor wrote<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\npublication of this debate is not justified: this is because in our view it would not add sufficiently to our understanding or otherwise clarify the issues for our readers.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"bottom-note\">\n  <span class=\"mod1\">CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 08.04.2026<\/span>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It seems that CEA just published my rather critical view of the recent ORMDL3 association paper. My letter had been first submitted to &#8220;Nature&#8221; but rejected after review. A rebuttal seemed to be necessary as the authors repeatedly highlight ORMDL3 as a new asthma gene &#8211; in the printed Nature paper, in the Nature podcast &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2008\/09\/ormdl3-more-inconsistencies-in-the-nature-paper\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">ORMDL3 &#8211; more inconsistencies in the Nature paper<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,2],"tags":[83,727],"class_list":["post-1699","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-asthma-allergy","category-genetics-biology","tag-asthma","tag-gene"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1699","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1699"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1699\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1699"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}