{"id":17602,"date":"2020-11-27T08:27:29","date_gmt":"2020-11-27T08:27:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/?p=17602"},"modified":"2020-12-12T17:08:12","modified_gmt":"2020-12-12T17:08:12","slug":"streeck-reloaded","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2020\/11\/streeck-reloaded\/","title":{"rendered":"Streeck reloaded"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Heinsberg study made headlines again this week, as according to a not further specified source<\/a> the authors allegedly missed more deaths after the study period (which I suspected aready 6 months ago from an analysis of local obituarities<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Interestingly, the Streeck study had not been pre-registered although this is being a standard procedure recommended by the ethics committee (the LEK certified the Gangelt study on March 24).<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Manuscript\/Paper comparison. May 5-June 4<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Funny to see that there is now a third version of the acknowledgments<\/a> . Comparing now the second (May 5 uploaded version) and third version (June 4 Nat comm<\/a>) it looks like a lot of name-dropping although Streeck still omitted Kai Diekmann.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I did not spend so much time on the most recent version but found large differences between the qualified anonymous reviewer #1 (who even discovered the DRKS issue) and the bored reviewer #2.\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

As there was a discussion in Germany if results have been “ordered in advance”, the answer to the question “Was there a statistical analysis plan (SAP)?” is being the most interesting part.<\/p>\n

Streeck et al write in the review document:\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

In my translation: “We had no plan but were very clear about the result”.<\/p>\n\n

 <\/p>\n

\n CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 04.05.2026<\/span>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Heinsberg study made headlines again this week, as according to a not further specified source the authors allegedly missed more deaths after the study period (which I suspected aready 6 months ago from an analysis of local obituarities). Interestingly, the Streeck study had not been pre-registered although this is being a standard procedure recommended … Continue reading Streeck reloaded<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[3405,3415],"class_list":["post-17602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-note-worthy","tag-gangelt","tag-streeck"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17602"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17602\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17746,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17602\/revisions\/17746"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}