{"id":17942,"date":"2021-01-24T06:45:05","date_gmt":"2021-01-24T06:45:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/?p=17942"},"modified":"2021-01-24T09:47:51","modified_gmt":"2021-01-24T09:47:51","slug":"uri-geller-in-nature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2021\/01\/uri-geller-in-nature\/","title":{"rendered":"Uri Geller in Nature"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Alle Nature Artikel in meinem engeren Arbeitsgebiet lagen daneben. Warum es\u00a0 aber trotzdem als h\u00f6chste Auszeichnung gilt, einen Artikel dort ver\u00f6ffentlicht zu haben? Wo doch die allermeisten Artikel <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/beat-it-impact-factor-publishing-elite-turns-against-controversial-metric-1.20224\">nicht einmal besonders h\u00e4ufig zitiert werden<\/a>?<br \/>\nUnd das mit <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=cost+publication+nature&amp;rlz=1C5CHFA_enDE892DE892&amp;oq=cost+publication+nature&amp;aqs=chrome..69i57j0i22i30l2.4734j1j4&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8\">Kosten f\u00fcr den deutschen Steuerzahler<\/a> in H\u00f6he von 9,500\u20ac?<\/p>\n<p>Vielleicht sollte man doch mal an einen der legend\u00e4rsten Artikel in Nature erinnern &#8211; die Studie zu Uri Geller (James Randi der den Geller Betrug aufgekl\u00e4rt hat <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/d41586-020-03050-5\">ist gerade erst verstorben<\/a>).<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The establishment of ESP [extrasensory perception] could conceivable require a paradigm shift (in Kuhn&#8217;s sense) of the most fundamental kind and our concepts of mind-brain relationships and cobsciousness would need radical alteration.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Es ist dabei nicht so sehr ein einzelner Artikel (den man nat\u00fcrlich h\u00e4tte ver\u00f6ffentlichen k\u00f6nnen) sondern der <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/search?q=Uri+Geller\">monatelange Hype<\/a>, der hier befeuert wurde.<\/p>\n<p>Doch zur\u00fcck zu den 9,500\u20ac von den kein Reviewer einen Cent sieht. <a href=\"https:\/\/undark.org\/2021\/01\/14\/big-science-publisher-is-going-open-access\/\">Undark<\/a> hat eine vernichtende Analyse des Gesch\u00e4ftsmodells<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But Springer Nature\u2019s announcement also exposes a deep structural problem in scientific publishing.\u00a0The proposed author fee, known as an article processing charge, or APC, is\u00a0several times higher\u00a0than what other publishers charge; it will likely be out of reach for researchers working outside of the world\u2019s top institutions. Viewed in that light, Springer Nature\u2019s move to open access seems less like a step toward equity and more like a corporation taking advantage of an uneven scientific funding landscape to increase its profits.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"bottom-note\">\n  <span class=\"mod1\">CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 26.04.2026<\/span>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Alle Nature Artikel in meinem engeren Arbeitsgebiet lagen daneben. Warum es\u00a0 aber trotzdem als h\u00f6chste Auszeichnung gilt, einen Artikel dort ver\u00f6ffentlicht zu haben? Wo doch die allermeisten Artikel nicht einmal besonders h\u00e4ufig zitiert werden? Und das mit Kosten f\u00fcr den deutschen Steuerzahler in H\u00f6he von 9,500\u20ac? Vielleicht sollte man doch mal an einen der legend\u00e4rsten &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2021\/01\/uri-geller-in-nature\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Uri Geller in Nature<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[3602],"class_list":["post-17942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophy-of-science","tag-nature"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17942"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17942\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17948,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17942\/revisions\/17948"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}