{"id":18943,"date":"2022-01-05T13:49:03","date_gmt":"2022-01-05T11:49:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/?p=18943"},"modified":"2022-01-05T13:49:03","modified_gmt":"2022-01-05T11:49:03","slug":"more-content-is-great-but-how-much-of-that-discovery-turns-out-to-be-unreliable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2022\/01\/more-content-is-great-but-how-much-of-that-discovery-turns-out-to-be-unreliable\/","title":{"rendered":"More content is great. But, how much of that discovery turns out to be unreliable?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A great paper by <a href=\"https:\/\/theclick.news\/unreliable-science-in-media\/\">Josie Fenske<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>More content is great. But, how much of that discovery turns out to be unreliable?<br \/>\n\u201cThe number was 2700 in 2020, but we have 3000 retractions a year now,\u201d says Oransky. The steady increase of retractions from year to year is a pattern that can be observed back to the beginning of Retraction Watch, and there\u2019s no indication of slowing down.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"bottom-note\">\n  <span class=\"mod1\">CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 26.04.2026<\/span>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A great paper by Josie Fenske More content is great. But, how much of that discovery turns out to be unreliable? \u201cThe number was 2700 in 2020, but we have 3000 retractions a year now,\u201d says Oransky. The steady increase of retractions from year to year is a pattern that can be observed back to &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2022\/01\/more-content-is-great-but-how-much-of-that-discovery-turns-out-to-be-unreliable\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">More content is great. But, how much of that discovery turns out to be unreliable?<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[1164,218],"class_list":["post-18943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophy-of-science","tag-integrity","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18943"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18944,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18943\/revisions\/18944"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}