{"id":20331,"date":"2022-08-03T10:50:48","date_gmt":"2022-08-03T08:50:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/?p=20331"},"modified":"2022-08-04T11:01:22","modified_gmt":"2022-08-04T09:01:22","slug":"i-would-also-like-to-apply-for-the-elsevier-bug-bounty-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2022\/08\/i-would-also-like-to-apply-for-the-elsevier-bug-bounty-program\/","title":{"rendered":"I would also like to apply for the Elsevier bug bounty program"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>a new proposal by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/d41586-022-02071-6\">Ivan Oransky<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Retractions must be supported as an essential part of healthy science. Sleuths should be compensated and given access to tools to improve the hunt for errors and fraud \u2014 not face ridicule, harassment and legal action. Publishers could create a cash pool to pay them, similar to the \u2018bug bounties\u2019 that reward hackers who detect flaws in computer security systems. At the same time, institutions should appropriately assess researchers who honestly aim to correct the record. Retractions should not be career killers \u2014 those correcting honest errors should be celebrated.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"bottom-note\">\n  <span class=\"mod1\">CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 12.04.2026<\/span>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>a new proposal by Ivan Oransky Retractions must be supported as an essential part of healthy science. Sleuths should be compensated and given access to tools to improve the hunt for errors and fraud \u2014 not face ridicule, harassment and legal action. Publishers could create a cash pool to pay them, similar to the \u2018bug &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2022\/08\/i-would-also-like-to-apply-for-the-elsevier-bug-bounty-program\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">I would also like to apply for the Elsevier bug bounty program<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[166,2549],"class_list":["post-20331","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophy-of-science","tag-elsevier","tag-retraction"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20331"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20331\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20335,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20331\/revisions\/20335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}