{"id":24784,"date":"2025-03-09T14:28:00","date_gmt":"2025-03-09T12:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/?p=24784"},"modified":"2025-03-10T11:55:52","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T09:55:52","slug":"i-asked-chatgpt-for-scientific-fields-that-have-completely-collapsed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2025\/03\/i-asked-chatgpt-for-scientific-fields-that-have-completely-collapsed\/","title":{"rendered":"I asked chatGPT for scientific fields that have completely collapsed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There are very few instances where an entire scientific field has completely collapsed but there are cases where once-prominent fields were either abandoned, replaced, or significantly redefined due to paradigm shifts. It would have taken me 2 weeks to compile this list while chatGPT could do that in seconds (and denies to have used Wikipedia). Here are some examples:<\/p>\n<p>1. Phlogiston Theory (18th Century) \u2013 Replaced by Modern Chemistry<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: A widely accepted theory that explained combustion and rusting as the release of an invisible substance called &#8220;phlogiston.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Antoine Lavoisier\u2019s discovery of oxygen in the late 18th century showed that combustion was actually a reaction with oxygen, not the loss of phlogiston. This led to the rise of modern chemistry and the fall of phlogiston theory.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>2. Geocentrism (Ptolemaic Model) \u2013 Replaced by Heliocentrism<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The belief that Earth was the center of the universe, with the Sun and planets orbiting it.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Observations by Copernicus, Galileo, and Kepler provided overwhelming evidence for a heliocentric solar system, where planets orbit the Sun.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>3. Vitalism \u2013 Replaced by Biochemistry and Molecular Biology<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The idea that living organisms were fundamentally different from non-living things because they contained a &#8220;vital force&#8221; beyond physical and chemical processes.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Discoveries in biochemistry and molecular biology, such as the synthesis of urea (W\u00f6hler, 1828) and the discovery of DNA&#8217;s structure, showed that life can be explained through chemistry and physics alone.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>4. Catastrophism (Pre-Darwinian Geology) \u2013 Replaced by Uniformitarianism<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The belief that Earth&#8217;s geological features were shaped primarily by sudden, short-lived catastrophic events (like Noah\u2019s flood).<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Charles Lyell&#8217;s uniformitarianism argued that slow, gradual processes (like erosion and sedimentation) shaped the Earth over millions of years. This view became the foundation for modern geology.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>5. Alchemy \u2013 Replaced by Modern Chemistry<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: A mix of mystical, philosophical, and proto-scientific ideas aimed at transforming base metals into gold and discovering the &#8220;elixir of life.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: The development of systematic chemical experimentation and the discovery of elements through atomic theory rendered alchemy obsolete.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>6. Ether Theory \u2013 Replaced by Relativity and Quantum Mechanics<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The idea that light waves needed a medium called &#8220;luminiferous ether&#8221; to propagate through space.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: The Michelson-Morley experiment (1887) failed to detect ether, and Einstein\u2019s theory of relativity (1905) showed that light does not need a medium to travel.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>7. Spontaneous Generation \u2013 Replaced by Germ Theory<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The belief that living organisms could arise spontaneously from non-living matter (e.g., maggots appearing from rotting meat).<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Louis Pasteur\u2019s experiments in the 19th century proved that life comes from pre-existing life, leading to the acceptance of germ theory.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>While complete collapses of scientific fields are rare, history shows that many dominant ideas have been overturned or refined as new evidence and methods emerge.<\/p>\n<p><!--nextpage-->After 1945, scientific fields have generally evolved rather than completely collapsed, as modern science relies on peer review and self-correction. However, some fields have been largely abandoned or radically transformed. Here are some examples:<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>1. Polywater (1960s\u20131970s) \u2013 Debunked as an Experimental Artifact<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Scientists believed they had discovered a new form of water, called &#8220;polywater,&#8221; which was more viscous and had unusual properties.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Further investigation revealed that the samples were contaminated with impurities, and polywater was not a new state of matter. Once this was exposed, research on it stopped entirely.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>2. Cold Fusion (1989) \u2013 Discredited but Still Controversial<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Scientists Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons claimed to have achieved nuclear fusion at room temperature, promising unlimited clean energy.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Other scientists failed to replicate their results, and methodological flaws were exposed. While some fringe research continues, mainstream nuclear physics has abandoned the idea.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>3. Soviet Lysenkoism (1940s\u20131960s) \u2013 Replaced by Modern Genetics<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Trofim Lysenko, a Soviet scientist, rejected Mendelian genetics and promoted the idea that acquired traits could be inherited. His ideas were politically enforced in the USSR, leading to disastrous agricultural policies.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Lysenko\u2019s methods failed, leading to crop failures and famine. After Stalin\u2019s death, genetics was gradually restored in Soviet science, and Lysenkoism was abandoned.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>4. Behaviorist Linguistics (Skinnerian View, 1950s\u20131960s) \u2013 Replaced by Chomskyan Linguistics<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: B.F. Skinner argued that language is learned entirely through conditioning (stimulus-response behavior).<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Noam Chomsky\u2019s critique (1959) showed that behaviorism couldn&#8217;t explain how children acquire complex grammar. His ideas on universal grammar reshaped linguistics, making behaviorist linguistics obsolete.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>5. Freudian Psychoanalysis \u2013 Declined in Scientific Psychology<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Sigmund Freud\u2019s theories on the unconscious mind, the Oedipus complex, and psychosexual development dominated psychology for much of the 20th century.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Empirical studies showed Freud\u2019s ideas lacked scientific rigor, and they were gradually replaced by cognitive and behavioral psychology. While psychoanalysis still exists in some clinical settings, it is no longer a dominant scientific framework.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>6. Human Racial Classification in Biology \u2013 Abandoned as a Scientific Concept<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The idea that humans could be divided into biologically distinct &#8220;races&#8221; with significant genetic differences.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Advances in genetics (like the Human Genome Project) showed that human genetic variation is continuous, with no clear racial boundaries. The idea of race as a biological concept has been replaced by population genetics.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>7. SETI\u2019s Early Model of Alien Contact \u2013 Reconsidered Due to Fermi\u2019s Paradox<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Early researchers in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) assumed that intelligent aliens would be widespread and easy to detect via radio signals.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Decades of listening to space with no confirmed signals led scientists to rethink assumptions about alien life, considering factors like the Great Filter or alternative methods of communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>While these fields didn\u2019t &#8220;collapse&#8221; overnight, they were largely abandoned, radically transformed, or relegated to pseudoscience.<\/p>\n<p><!--nextpage-->Clinical medicine has seen many paradigm shifts since 1945, with some fields, treatments, and theories being abandoned due to new evidence. Here are some notable examples:<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>1. Frontal Lobotomy \u2013 Abandoned in the 1950s\u201360s<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: A surgical procedure that severed connections in the prefrontal cortex to treat mental illness, especially schizophrenia and severe depression.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: The development of antipsychotic medications (like chlorpromazine in the 1950s) provided a safer and more effective treatment. Lobotomies caused severe cognitive and personality changes, leading to their near-total abandonment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>2. Radical Mastectomy \u2013 Replaced by Less Invasive Breast Cancer Surgery<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: A highly invasive procedure removing the breast, chest muscles, and lymph nodes to treat breast cancer.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Studies (notably by Bernard Fisher in the 1970s) showed that less aggressive surgeries (like lumpectomy with radiation) were just as effective but had fewer complications. Radical mastectomy is now rarely performed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>3. Routine Tonsillectomy \u2013 Dramatic Decline Since the 1970s<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The removal of tonsils was once a routine childhood procedure, often done for minor throat infections.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Research showed that most tonsil infections resolve naturally and that tonsillectomy should be reserved for recurrent, severe cases. The procedure is now performed much less frequently.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>4. Twilight Sleep for Childbirth \u2013 Abandoned by the 1970s<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: A combination of morphine and scopolamine used in the early-to-mid 20th century to induce &#8220;painless&#8221; childbirth, but it left women semi-conscious and amnesic.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: It was found to be dangerous for both mothers and babies, leading to complications like respiratory depression in newborns. It was replaced by epidurals and modern pain management techniques.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>5. X-Ray for Pregnancy Monitoring \u2013 Stopped in the 1950s\u201360s<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: X-rays were routinely used to assess fetal position and size during pregnancy.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Research in the 1950s (notably by Alice Stewart) linked prenatal X-ray exposure to childhood cancer (leukemia). Ultrasound, which is much safer, replaced it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>6. Bloodletting for Common Illnesses \u2013 Finally Died Out in the Mid-20th Century<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The ancient practice of removing blood to &#8220;balance humors&#8221; was still used for conditions like hypertension and pneumonia well into the 20th century.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Scientific studies showed that it was ineffective and often harmful. It was replaced by evidence-based treatments like antibiotics and antihypertensive drugs. (Bloodletting is still used in rare conditions like hemochromatosis but under strict medical guidelines.)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>7. Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) for All Postmenopausal Women \u2013 Drastically Reduced After 2002<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: HRT (estrogen + progestin) was widely prescribed to postmenopausal women to prevent osteoporosis, heart disease, and general aging effects.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: The Women\u2019s Health Initiative (WHI) study in 2002 found that HRT increased the risk of breast cancer, heart disease, and stroke. Prescriptions dropped dramatically, and HRT is now used only for specific cases with careful risk assessment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>8. Chelation Therapy for Heart Disease \u2013 Debunked in the Late 20th Century<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Originally developed for heavy metal poisoning, chelation therapy (using EDTA) was promoted as a treatment for coronary artery disease.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Large clinical trials found no clear benefit, and the American Heart Association does not recommend it for cardiovascular disease. However, some alternative medicine practitioners still promote it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>9. Fetal Surgery for Non-Life-Threatening Conditions \u2013 Reduced Since the 1990s<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Experimental in utero surgeries for conditions like spina bifida and congenital diaphragmatic hernia were attempted in the 1980s and 1990s.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Many procedures carried high risks with unclear benefits. Today, fetal surgery is only done for select cases where survival is at stake, and the risks are justified.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>10. Therapeutic Use of Leeches and Maggots \u2013 Mostly Declined (but Still Used in Niche Cases)<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Leeches were once widely used for bloodletting, and maggots for wound healing.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Antibiotics and advanced wound care made these treatments obsolete for most conditions. However, maggot therapy is still occasionally used for debridement of chronic wounds, and leeches are used in reconstructive surgery for venous congestion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>11. Laetrile (Vitamin B17) as a Cancer Treatment \u2013 Discredited by the 1980s<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: A supposed &#8220;natural&#8221; cancer cure derived from apricot seeds, heavily promoted in the 1970s.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Clinical trials showed no effectiveness, and it was banned by the FDA due to toxicity (it releases cyanide in the body).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>12. Psychosurgery Beyond Lobotomy \u2013 Largely Disappeared by the 1980s<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Other brain surgeries for psychiatric disorders, like cingulotomy and amygdalotomy, were performed after lobotomies fell out of favor.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Advances in psychopharmacology (antidepressants, antipsychotics) and ethical concerns made these procedures rare. Today, deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used in extreme cases, but it\u2019s a much more refined approach.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>13. Routine Use of Antibiotics for Viral Infections \u2013 Discouraged Since the 1990s<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: For decades, antibiotics were prescribed for colds, flu, and other viral infections due to overconfidence in their benefits.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: The rise of antibiotic resistance made this practice dangerous. Guidelines now emphasize antibiotic stewardship, and most doctors avoid prescribing antibiotics for viral illnesses.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>These are just some examples of medical practices that were once widely accepted but were later abandoned due to better scientific understanding. Clinical medicine continues to evolve as new evidence emerges.<\/p>\n<p><!--nextpage-->Biochemistry and immunology have seen major paradigm shifts since 1945, with some fields and theories becoming obsolete due to new discoveries. Here are some notable examples:<\/p>\n<p>1. One Gene\u2013One Enzyme Hypothesis (1940s\u20131960s) \u2192 Replaced by Modern Gene Regulation Theory<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Originally proposed by Beadle and Tatum, this theory stated that each gene codes for a single enzyme.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Further research showed that genes can code for multiple proteins through alternative splicing and post-translational modifications. Additionally, non-coding RNA (e.g., microRNAs) plays a crucial role in gene regulation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>2. Protein-Only Hypothesis of Enzymes (Pre-1980s) \u2192 Replaced by Ribozymes &amp; RNA Catalysis<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: It was believed that all biological catalysts were proteins (enzymes).<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: The discovery of ribozymes (catalytic RNA molecules) in the 1980s by Sidney Altman and Thomas Cech showed that RNA itself could catalyze reactions, revolutionizing our understanding of molecular biology.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>3. Central Dogma as a One-Way Flow of Genetic Information (1950s\u20131970s) \u2192 Revised with Reverse Transcription &amp; Epigenetics<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Francis Crick\u2019s &#8220;Central Dogma&#8221; suggested that genetic information flows from DNA \u2192 RNA \u2192 Protein, in a unidirectional manner.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: The discovery of reverse transcriptase (enzyme used by retroviruses like HIV) in the 1970s showed that RNA can convert back into DNA. Later, epigenetics revealed that external factors (like methylation) can regulate gene expression without changing DNA sequences.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>4. Warburg Hypothesis of Cancer as a Metabolic Disease (1920s\u20131970s) \u2192 Shifted to Genetic Basis of Cancer<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Otto Warburg suggested that cancer was caused primarily by metabolic dysfunction (abnormal glucose metabolism).<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: While metabolism plays a role, the discovery of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in the 1970s\u20131980s (e.g., p53, RAS mutations) showed that cancer is primarily a genetic disease, not just a metabolic disorder.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>5. Lock-and-Key Model of Enzyme Function (Early 20th Century\u20131960s) \u2192 Replaced by Induced Fit Model<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The idea that enzymes and substrates fit together like a key in a lock, with a rigid structure.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Daniel Koshland\u2019s Induced Fit Model (1958) showed that enzymes are dynamic and change shape upon binding to substrates, improving catalytic efficiency.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>6. &#8220;Junk DNA&#8221; Concept (1960s\u20131990s) \u2192 Replaced by Functional Non-Coding DNA<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Scientists once thought that large portions of the human genome (over 90%) were &#8220;junk&#8221; with no function.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Research (especially from the ENCODE Project in the 2000s) found that much of this non-coding DNA has regulatory functions, including enhancers, promoters, and microRNAs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!--nextpage-->Immunology<\/p>\n<p>1. Self-Nonself Model of Immunity (1940s\u20131990s) \u2192 Replaced by Danger Model<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The idea that the immune system simply distinguishes between &#8220;self&#8221; (body&#8217;s own cells) and &#8220;nonself&#8221; (foreign invaders like bacteria or viruses).<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Polly Matzinger\u2019s Danger Model (1994) proposed that the immune system responds not just to &#8220;nonself&#8221; but to danger signals, such as cellular stress, necrosis, and inflammation. This better explains autoimmune diseases and immune tolerance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>2. Hygiene Hypothesis (1980s) \u2192 Refined with Microbiome Research<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The hypothesis suggested that lack of childhood exposure to germs increased susceptibility to allergies and autoimmune diseases.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: While partially true, modern research on the gut microbiome (2010s) refined this view, showing that a balanced microbiome (rather than just germ exposure) is critical for immune development.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>3. Original Antigenic Sin Theory (1950s) \u2192 Modified by Immunological Plasticity<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: The idea that once the immune system encounters a pathogen, it preferentially responds to the first strain encountered, even if a new variant emerges.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Studies on flu, COVID-19, and other viruses show that the immune system is more adaptive and plastic than originally thought, though antigenic imprinting still plays a role.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>4. Th1\/Th2 Dichotomy (1980s\u20132000s) \u2192 Expanded to Include Th17, Tregs, and More<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Initially, helper T cells (CD4+) were classified into Th1 (cell-mediated immunity) and Th2 (antibody-mediated immunity).<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: The discovery of Th17 cells (involved in autoimmune diseases) and T regulatory cells (Tregs, crucial for immune suppression and tolerance) in the 2000s showed that the immune system is far more complex than a simple Th1\/Th2 balance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>5. Complete Eradication of Infectious Diseases by Vaccination (Overly Optimistic View in the 1960s\u20131980s)<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: After the success of smallpox eradication (1980), scientists thought other infectious diseases (like measles and polio) would be fully eradicated soon.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Factors like vaccine hesitancy, viral evolution, and zoonotic spillover events (e.g., COVID-19, influenza mutations) have shown that infectious diseases persist despite vaccination efforts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p>6. Humoral vs. Cellular Immunity as a Strict Dichotomy (Mid-20th Century) \u2192 Recognized as Interdependent<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What it was: Early immunologists thought of antibody-driven (humoral) immunity and T-cell-driven (cellular) immunity as two separate branches.<\/li>\n<li>Why it collapsed: Modern immunology has shown strong crosstalk between B cells, T cells, and innate immune responses. For example, T follicular helper cells (Tfh) are critical for antibody production, blurring the line between cellular and humoral immunity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Biochemistry and immunology have seen massive shifts in understanding since 1945, often due to new experimental techniques (e.g., PCR, genome sequencing, CRISPR) and conceptual breakthroughs. Many ideas that were once foundational have been refined, replaced, or completely abandoned as science progresses.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"bottom-note\">\n  <span class=\"mod1\">CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 14.04.2026<\/span>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There are very few instances where an entire scientific field has completely collapsed but there are cases where once-prominent fields were either abandoned, replaced, or significantly redefined due to paradigm shifts. It would have taken me 2 weeks to compile this list while chatGPT could do that in seconds (and denies to have used Wikipedia). &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/sciencesurf\/2025\/03\/i-asked-chatgpt-for-scientific-fields-that-have-completely-collapsed\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">I asked chatGPT for scientific fields that have completely collapsed<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24784","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-note-worthy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24784","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24784"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24784\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24790,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24784\/revisions\/24790"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24784"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24784"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wjst.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24784"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}