I have recently read about a round-table discussion on “so called experts” – a frequent topic in environmental circles. Have to say that I do not fear so much half-way baked knowledge – even renowned experts are occasionally slipping to a closely related field where they are no expert at all. Or do you believe that a Nobel prize winner in physics has any primacy in ethics?<\/p>\n
In the same vein, there is comment in nature medicine<\/a> about Wikipedia – complaining that a 4th year medical student (“who is barely old enough to buy beer”) has such a large influence on medical writing at Wikipedia. As there doesn’t follow any details of his major errors or misunderstandings, I conclude that this comment is more about the beer drinking habits of the author Brandom Keim.<\/p>\n Anyway, there are quite interesting new sites by medical doctors like Gantyd<\/a> (get a note from your doctor) with 3000 topic pages, 200 editors from 6 countries) or Ask Dr. Wiki<\/a> (4 editors, clinical notes, pearls, ECGs, X-ray images and coronary angiograms) all worth a look.<\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n I have recently read about a round-table discussion on “so called experts” – a frequent topic in environmental circles. Have to say that I do not fear so much half-way baked knowledge – even renowned experts are occasionally slipping to a closely related field where they are no expert at all. Or do you believe … Continue reading Science crowd-sourced<\/span>