Vitamin D was introduced into clinical medicine in 2 large waves basically in the 1930ies and 1960ies without any clinical study.<\/p>\n
Although I am interested in the relationship twith allergy since 1999<\/a> none of our proposed four vitamin D trials were funded.<\/p>\n 2005: “Vitamin D and Induction of Allergies” Unfortunately the\u00a0 published clinical studies so far missed the point <\/a>as they were looking only at pregnancy and not at newborn supplements (VDAART<\/a>, COPSAC<\/a> and Grant\/NZ<\/a>).<\/p>\n But there are good news now, as studies are going on in Australia and Finland that are sufficiently powered and examining exposure in the newborn period:\u00a0VIDI<\/a> and VITALITY<\/a>.\u00a0The only problem there will be the inevitable\u00a0co-exposure by vitamin D supplemented baby food.<\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n Vitamin D was introduced into clinical medicine in 2 large waves basically in the 1930ies and 1960ies without any clinical study. Although I am interested in the relationship twith allergy since 1999 none of our proposed four vitamin D trials were funded. 2005: “Vitamin D and Induction of Allergies” 2013: “Vitamin D and allergy (VIT-AL)” … Continue reading Vitamin D trials in newborns never done<\/span>
\n2013: “Vitamin D and allergy (VIT-AL)”
\n2017: “Biomarker Screening of Vitamin D response in Newborns (VITAPRIME)”
\n2017: “Immunological effects of vitamin D supplementation in newborns in Ghana (IMVITAD-GHA)”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n