Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Allergy, Software

A useless study of AI accuracy

31.03.2025 admin
https://www.jaci-inpractice.org/article/S2213-2198(25)00280-6/pdf

Although promised, the supplement with the questions is missing and there is no information in the methods how the authors prompted – so basically useless as methods cannot be replicated.

And at the end, chatGPT is only a mirror of how good or bad these experts informed the public…

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 06.09.2026
aiallergy

Post navigation

Previous PostI asked chatGPT about SARS-CoV-2 genome similarities and this is what I gotNext PostCochrane: Aprilscherz ja oder nein?

About

A science blog since 2006
Staying on top of the wave
Non-profit, no cookies, no ads
AI content is labelled

Impressum

Feed

RSS

Last Changes

  • Scientific integrity investigators are the last resort
  • A sense of humour is a survival skill
  • Inherently dishonest people
  • Link to a note from desktop
  • Die Bayerische Landesärztekammer (BLAEK): Die Selbstbedienung der Selbstverwaltung
  • Zwei Schichten in der Logienquelle: Eine AI basierte Analyse
  • Reality surpasses anything one could imagine
  • Scientific publishing in the age of interacting AIs
  • High-Frequency Science: When Author AI Meets Publisher AI (Long Version)
  • What if decades of immunology and infection research go in the bin?
  • On mice and men with asthma
  • The credential inflation playbook: How to buy your way into fake prestige
  • Ein Haltung der Integrität
  • Another version
  • Das war es dann

Search

Impressum Proudly powered by WordPress