Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Allergy, Software

A useless study of AI accuracy

31.03.2025 admin
https://www.jaci-inpractice.org/article/S2213-2198(25)00280-6/pdf

Although promised, the  supplement with the questions is missing and there is no information in the methods how the authors prompted – so basically useless as methods cannot be replicated.

And at the end, chatGPT is only a mirror of how good or bad these experts informed the public…

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 09.06.2026
aiallergy

Post navigation

Previous PostI asked chatGPT about SARS-CoV-2 genome similarities and this is what I gotNext PostCochrane: Aprilscherz ja oder nein?

About

A science blog since 2006
staying on top of the wave
non-profit, no cookies, no ads

RSS

Impressum

Last Changes

  • The EMA on Zandoriah
  • Dabrocks Ethik
  • Why the Eickelberg “Gold Standard Science” editorial is so ridiculously shallow
  • Bias und Deception in den Bewertungssystemen von Google und Ebay
  • Das Deutsche Ärzteblatt und die Münchner Medizinische Wochenschrift: Vitamin D Märchenstunde
  • High-Frequency Science: When Author AI Meets Publisher AI (Long Version)
  • The NEJM’s peer review from beyond
  • The Padua pipeline - how a sanctioned Iranian university publishes clinical data in an off topic Italian open access journal
  • Epithelial barrier hypothesis now confirmed
  • There is no average patient
  • Die Bayerische Landesärztekammer (BLAEK): Die Selbstbedienung der Selbstverwaltung
  • US demands on African countries in exchange for health aid
  • The Stockholm declarations never worked
  • Was ist das Wahre daran – und was das Falsche?
  • Tarzahn aus Timbuktu

Search

Impressum Proudly powered by WordPress