On criticism of a scientific paper

There is a great piece at https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/

It reports “all the stupid things that researchers say in order to deflect legitimate criticism”

The corrections do not affect the main results of the paper…
The criticism should be dismissed because the critics are obsessive/Stasi/terrorists…
The critics are jealous losers sniping at their betters…
The criticism is illegitimate if it does not go through the peer-review process…