But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil
Tuesday, March 20th

Science crowd-sourced

I have recently read about a round-table discussion on “so called experts” – a frequent topic in environmental circles. Have to say that I do not fear so much half-way baked knowledge – even renowned experts are occasionally slipping to a closely related field where they are no expert at all. Or do you believe that a Nobel prize winner in physics has any primacy in ethics?

In the same vein, there is comment in nature medicine about Wikipedia – complaining that a 4th year medical student (“who is barely old enough to buy beer”) has such a large influence on medical writing at Wikipedia. As there doesn´t follow any details of his major errors or misunderstandings, I conclude that this comment is more about the beer drinking habits of the author Brandom Keim.

Anyway, there are quite interesting new sites by medical doctors like Gantyd (“get a note from your doctor”, so far 3000 topic pages, 200 editors from 6 countries) or Ask Dr. Wiki (4 editors, clinical notes, pearls, ECGs, X-ray images and coronary angiograms) all worth a look.

Related Posts: What discriminates science journalists and science bloggers?, Mental accounting and (science) consumer choice, Celebrities on science
Categories: History + Insights,Human + Rights,Philosophy of Science
Keywords: , ,
Trackback: http://www.wjst.de/blog/2007/03/20/science-crowd-sourced/


Leave a Reply