Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Philosophy

How frequent is scientific misconduct?

16.08.2017 admin

Figure 3. Admission rates of Questionable Research Practices (QRP) in self- and non-self-reports.
N indicates the number of survey questions. Boxplots show median and interquartiles.
Reference https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.g003

 

Correct answer: at least 20%

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 01.05.2026, click to save as PDF

Post navigation

Previous PostScientific misconductNext PostDunning-Kruger effect

About

A science blog since 2006
staying on top of the wave
non-profit, no cookies, no ads

RSS

Impressum

Last Changes

  • Tarzahn aus Timbuktu
  • The Stockholm declarations never worked
  • The Padua pipeline - how a sanctioned Iranian university publishes clinical data in an off topic Italian open access journal
  • Epithelial barrier hypothesis now confirmed
  • Die Bayerische Landesärztekammer (BLAEK): Die Selbstbedienung der Selbstverwaltung
  • Why Maxwell’s statement proved too much
  • Das Deutsche Ärzteblatt und die Münchner Medizinische Wochenschrift: Vitamin D Märchenstunde
  • The lifecycle of the academic journal is coming to an end now
  • Paracetamol and autism in "Environmental Health": A dubious paper that made politics
  • Datenschutz in Bayern
  • Eine illustrierte Geschichte des gsf/Helmholtz Forschungszentrums München
  • Why you can’t change the rules after the game has started
  • Primary prevention of cow’s milk sensitization and food allergy by avoiding supplementation
  • Genetic discrimination
  • Good morning Anthropic

Search

Impressum Proudly powered by WordPress