Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Philosophy

How frequent is scientific misconduct?

16.08.2017 admin

Figure 3. Admission rates of Questionable Research Practices (QRP) in self- and non-self-reports.
N indicates the number of survey questions. Boxplots show median and interquartiles.
Reference https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.g003

 

Correct answer: at least 20%

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 08.11.2025 VG Wort note save PDF

Post navigation

Previous PostScientific misconductNext PostDunning-Kruger effect

About

A science blog since 2006
staying on top of the wave
non-profit, no cookies, no ads

RSS

Impressum

Last Changes

  • Is there a data agnostic method to find repetitive data in clinical trials?
  • Forensic image analysis
  • Wer braucht wann wieviel Vitamin D und warum?
  • No allergy protection of children by farms
  • Die unangenehme Wahrheit des Mai Thi Videos
  • It‘s not theft
  • Rhetorik statt Reflexion: Eine Replik
  • Dung hill counting
  • More dung hills
  • Rape with extreme violence
  • Christlicher Realismus
  • A forensic analysis of the Prince Andrew/Giuffre/Maxwell image
  • Parental allergy history at farms
  • Das Versagen der evangelischen Kirche Deutschlands
  • Die Bayerische Landesärztekammer (BLAEK): Die Selbstbedienung der Selbstverwaltung

Search

Impressum Proudly powered by WordPress