Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Philosophy

How frequent is scientific misconduct?

16.08.2017 admin

Figure 3. Admission rates of Questionable Research Practices (QRP) in self- and non-self-reports.
N indicates the number of survey questions. Boxplots show median and interquartiles.
Reference https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.g003

 

Correct answer: at least 20%

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf 16.08.2017, access 19.10.2025 VG Wort counter note save PDF

Post navigation

Previous PostScientific misconductNext PostDunning-Kruger effect

About

A science blog since 2006
staying on top of the wave
non-profit, no cookies, no ads

RSS

Impressum

Last Changes

  • Paracetamol and autism in "Environmental Health": A dubious paper that made politics
  • The Science Publishing Industry as Turbo-Capitalism. A manifesto.
  • Why are editors at even highranked scientific journals no more experienced scientists but rather young PhD?
  • Die Bayerische Landesärztekammer (BLAEK): Die Selbstbedienung der Selbstverwaltung
  • Digitale Souveränität
  • Why we should abandon the Nobel prize
  • Why dog and cat can't marry
  • Meritocracy
  • Ralf Frisch und sein "Fuck you Greta" Artikel auf Zeitzeichen
  • Is there a seahorse emoji?
  • Das Versagen der evangelischen Kirche Deutschlands
  • A long journey
  • Fragen und Antworten zur Staatsräson
  • Otto Hahn, Lise Meitner und Fritz Straßmann
  • We did not learn the COVID19 lesson

Search

Impressum Proudly powered by WordPress