Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Philosophy

How frequent is scientific misconduct?

16.08.2017 admin

Figure 3. Admission rates of Questionable Research Practices (QRP) in self- and non-self-reports.
N indicates the number of survey questions. Boxplots show median and interquartiles.
Reference https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.g003

 

Correct answer: at least 20%

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 16.12.2025 VG Wort note save PDF

Post navigation

Previous PostScientific misconductNext PostDunning-Kruger effect

About

A science blog since 2006
staying on top of the wave
non-profit, no cookies, no ads

RSS

Impressum

Last Changes

  • Wie uns KI längst manipuliert
  • Why the “immunity debt” narrative ultimately collapsed
  • The biggest turning point in medical science that I have probably ever encountered
  • Why doesn't the NEJM retract?
  • Tacrolimus shares the allergy inducing pathway with vitamin D
  • Lügen erscheinen dem Verstand einleuchtender
  • KI als Provokation für den Glauben?
  • Correct me if I am wrong
  • Need you love
  • Nearly 50 years after Messner and Habeler
  • We will survive
  • Wer braucht wann wieviel Vitamin D und warum?
  • The master animals of Linnäus
  • Is there a seahorse emoji?
  • Das Versagen der evangelischen Kirche Deutschlands

Search

Impressum Proudly powered by WordPress