Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Philosophy, Software

Scientific PDFs

12.07.2021 admin

I found only one relevant blog post about PDFs produced by scientific publishers.

Although PDFs are the main formal output nowadays (no more “papers”) there is basically no standardization which meta data should be included in scientifc PDFs. It’s largely due to the software in the production office what’s in the PDF document — a largely underused resource.

This is at least my experience when working on an image duplication pipeline in scientific papers. But test it yourself ….

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 17.07.2026
PDFduplicationgood-scientific-practiceimagemetadatapipelinescientific paper

Post navigation

Previous PostEthik gegen UEFA 0:10Next PostCOVID19 Testzentren oder reicht ein COVID19 Selbsttest?

About

A science blog since 2006
Staying on top of the wave
Non-profit, no cookies, no ads
AI content is labelled

Impressum

Feed

RSS

Last Changes

  • How to interpret an odds ratio of less than 1
  • Zur Katherina Reiche Diskussion - müssen KI Beiträge gekennzeichnet werden?
  • Is peer review overrated? Are journals superfluous?
  • Farm dust and immune readouts
  • The Südhof Nomenclature
  • Markus Blume und die künstliche Intelligenz
  • A bookmarklet that highlights AI generated prose
  • Datenschutz in Bayern
  • Ralf Frisch und sein "Fuck you Greta" Artikel auf Zeitzeichen
  • Double blind peer review - well-intentioned but too many side effects
  • 250€ per review
  • AI is killing humans
  • Time to re-visit Naomi Klein
  • Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics
  • The Padua pipeline - how a sanctioned Iranian university publishes clinical data in an off topic Italian open access journal

Search

Impressum Proudly powered by WordPress