Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Allergy, Software

A useless study of AI accuracy

31.03.2025 admin
https://www.jaci-inpractice.org/article/S2213-2198(25)00280-6/pdf

Although promised, the  supplement with the questions is missing and there is no information in the methods how the authors prompted – so basically useless as methods cannot be replicated.

And at the end, chatGPT is only a mirror of how good or bad these experts informed the public…

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 13.12.2025 VG Wort note save PDF
aiallergy

Post navigation

Previous PostI asked chatGPT about SARS-CoV-2 genome similarities and this is what I gotNext PostCochrane: Aprilscherz ja oder nein?

About

A science blog since 2006
staying on top of the wave
non-profit, no cookies, no ads

RSS

Impressum

Last Changes

  • Why the “immunity debt” narrative ultimately collapsed
  • The biggest turning point in medical science that I have probably ever encountered
  • Why doesn't the NEJM retract?
  • Tacrolimus shares the allergy inducing pathway with vitamin D
  • Lügen erscheinen dem Verstand einleuchtender
  • KI als Provokation für den Glauben?
  • Correct me if I am wrong
  • Need you love
  • Nearly 50 years after Messner and Habeler
  • We will survive
  • Wer braucht wann wieviel Vitamin D und warum?
  • The master animals of Linnäus
  • Is there a seahorse emoji?
  • Das Versagen der evangelischen Kirche Deutschlands
  • Rhetorik statt Reflexion: Eine Replik

Search

Impressum Proudly powered by WordPress