Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Allergy, Software

A useless study of AI accuracy

31.03.2025 admin
https://www.jaci-inpractice.org/article/S2213-2198(25)00280-6/pdf

Although promised, the  supplement with the questions is missing and there is no information in the methods how the authors prompted – so basically useless as methods cannot be replicated.

And at the end, chatGPT is only a mirror of how good or bad these experts informed the public…

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf , accessed 27.04.2026, click to save as PDF
aiallergy

Post navigation

Previous PostI asked chatGPT about SARS-CoV-2 genome similarities and this is what I gotNext PostCochrane: Aprilscherz ja oder nein?

About

A science blog since 2006
staying on top of the wave
non-profit, no cookies, no ads

RSS

Impressum

Last Changes

  • Tarzahn aus Timbuktu
  • Das Deutsche Ärzteblatt und die Münchner Medizinische Wochenschrift: Vitamin D Märchenstunde
  • The lifecycle of the academic journal is coming to an end now
  • Why Maxwell’s statement proved too much
  • Die Bayerische Landesärztekammer (BLAEK): Die Selbstbedienung der Selbstverwaltung
  • Paracetamol and autism in "Environmental Health": A dubious paper that made politics
  • Datenschutz in Bayern
  • Eine illustrierte Geschichte des gsf/Helmholtz Forschungszentrums München
  • Why you can’t change the rules after the game has started
  • Primary prevention of cow’s milk sensitization and food allergy by avoiding supplementation
  • Genetic discrimination
  • Good morning Anthropic
  • How to identify copy-pasted data patterns in Excel tables
  • Von der Bildmanipulation zur Millionen Entschädigung
  • Is there a data agnostic method to find repetitive data in clinical trials?

Search

Impressum Proudly powered by WordPress