Science Surf
But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay.
For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
Allergy, Software

A useless study of AI accuracy

31.03.2025 admin
https://www.jaci-inpractice.org/article/S2213-2198(25)00280-6/pdf

Although promised, the  supplement with the questions is missing and there is no information in the methods how the authors prompted – so basically useless as methods cannot be replicated.

And at the end, chatGPT is only a mirror of how good or bad these experts informed the public…

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 04.11.2025 VG Wort note save PDF
aiallergy

Post navigation

Previous PostI asked chatGPT about SARS-CoV-2 genome similarities and this is what I gotNext PostCochrane: Aprilscherz ja oder nein?

About

A science blog since 2006
staying on top of the wave
non-profit, no cookies, no ads

RSS

Impressum

Last Changes

  • No allergy protection of children by farms
  • Die unangenehme Wahrheit des Mai Thi Videos
  • It‘s not theft
  • Rhetorik statt Reflexion: Eine Replik
  • Is there a data agnostic method to find repetitive data in clinical trials?
  • Dung hill counting
  • More dung hills
  • Rape with extreme violence
  • Christlicher Realismus
  • A forensic analysis of the Prince Andrew/Giuffre/Maxwell image
  • Parental allergy history at farms
  • Das Versagen der evangelischen Kirche Deutschlands
  • Die Bayerische Landesärztekammer (BLAEK): Die Selbstbedienung der Selbstverwaltung
  • The Science Publishing Industry as Turbo-Capitalism. A manifesto.
  • Why we should abandon the Nobel prize

Search

Impressum Proudly powered by WordPress