Category Archives: Philosophy

U-P-S-I-D-E – data sharing policy

A paper (that I found only recently) summarizes the responsibility of authorship in the life sciences. Sharing publication- related data is a key element of the life sciences and there is concern that in practice materials are not always readily available to the research community. U-P-S-I-D-E stands for “uniform principles for sharing integral data and materials expeditiously”. The authors come from major U.S. universities and companies and have developed 10 recommendations that should be in the curriculum of every PhD program – go to the executive summary at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.900068

Errare humanum est

All4quotes and becontent have (mainly German) quotes. My all time favorites are

Aurelius Augustinus: Irren ist menschlich, aber aus Leidenschaft im Irrtum zu verharren, ist teuflisch.

August von Kotzebue: Menschen irren, aber nur große Menschen erkennen ihren Irrtum.

Christian Friedrich Hebbel: Die Menschheit läßt sich keinen Irrtum nehmen, der ihr nützt.

Friedrich von Schiller: Liegt der Irrtum nur erst, wie ein Grundstein, unter dem Boden, immer baut man darauf, nimmermehr kömmt er an den Tag.

Friedrich von Schiller: Hundertmal wer ich’s euch sagen und tausendmal: Irrtum ist Irrtum! Ob ihn der größte Mann, ob ihn der kleinste beging.

Georg Christoph Lichtenberg: Nur der Betrug entehrt, der Irrtum nie.

Continue reading Errare humanum est

Search for crystals

First monday has an interesting paper on the 100 most visited Wikipedia pages for the period of September 2006 to January 2007 (Wikipedia is the ninth most visited site in the U.S. with 43 million visitors). The crystal search link in the paper does not work but the table reports that science ranks at place 5 – not too bad.

crystal3.jpgcrystal2.jpgcrystal1.jpg

Hypomania

The Lancet has a comprehensive review of bipolar disorders- finally I learned about the distinction between type I (includes mania) and type II (hypomania). BTW the author thinks that there is no sound evidence for the DSM-IV priority for mood changes; Kraepelin had no priority for mood, thinking or activity altering changes after all). Continue reading Hypomania

Research on totalitarism

Süddeutsche Zeitung reports that the Hanna-Arendt Institute for Research on Totalitarism has dismissed its director as three quarter of the scientific staff now voted against him. This seems to be a quite unusual case that the scientific staff has such a strong voice – I can’t renember so many other cases in the hierarchical academic system.

Gary Taube’s limits and my interest in molecular epidemiology

Curative medicine contributes only 10% to 40% to individual health (figures are depending on models and methodology according to a recent commentary in the Deutsche Ärzteblatt, for milestones check the BMJ) – a reason why I finally decided to become an epidemiologist. Continue reading Gary Taube’s limits and my interest in molecular epidemiology

Antedisciplinary Science

.. another thoughtful essay by Sean Eddy in PLOS Computational Biology cites the NIH Roadmap Initiative

The scale and complexity of today’s biomedical research problems demand that scientists move beyond the confines of their individual disciplines and explore new organizational models for team science. Advances in molecular imaging, for example, require collaborations among diverse groups—radiologists, cell biologists, physicists, and computer programmers.

which sounds great like all interdisciplinary science but has also all the drawbacks (“to temper the wind to the shorn lamb” seems to be the English translation of the German “weakest ring of the chain”).

Progress is driven by new scientific questions, which demand new ways of thinking. You want to go where a question takes you, not where your training left you.

Sure, the game is more about interdisciplinary people than interdisciplinary teams

A motley crew of misfits

and not EU accountants drive progress.

How much do you think a scientific blog post is worth

(in US dollars) asks Pimm – the partial immortalization blog. A first response to this question -based on Google adsense revenues- is about $0.47/post. I think that prices depend on context – from negative balance (wasted time) to a new research direction (+tenure +$100,000) there is everything possible.