vs

War das ein Aprilscherz? Nein, offensichtlich nicht, obwohl am 1.4. veröffentlicht.
Aber gibt es ja auch in Berlin so ein dubioses “Forschungszentrum” am Institut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie der Charité.
Und Cochrane: Waren das nicht die EBM Evidenzfetischisten die sowohl gegen Testen und Masken waren und die gerade pleite sind trotz Alimente?
https://chatgpt.com/share/67e9741d-bcf4-8000-bb60-26dc50e6fa5f
Where was the closest sequence observed before the first COVID-19 sequence?
The closest known sequence to the first identified SARS-CoV-2 genome (from Wuhan, China, in December 2019) comes from bat coronaviruses, particularly RaTG13, which was found in a bat (Rhinolophus affinis) in Yunnan, China, in 2013. RaTG13 shares about 96.2% genetic similarity with SARS-CoV-2, making it the closest known relative at the time. Additionally, other similar sequences, such as BANAL-52, BANAL-103, and BANAL-236, were later discovered in bats in Laos, showing even closer similarity in certain regions of the genome. Would you like more details on these related viruses?
Continue reading I asked chatGPT about SARS-CoV-2 genome similarities and this is what I got
„Ich bin Professorin an der Fachhochschule XY und erkläre meinen Studierenden, wie sie ihre Meinung am besten ungefiltert an die Adressaten bringen, denn das legitimiert in Zeiten der postfaktischen Politik.”
Wikipedia listet die Absolventenliste dieser FH
I have occasionally selected a paper of the year, that I enjoyed most for reading. Usually this was not a breakthrough paper but a more hidden pearl. BMJ Christmas and Ig Nobel 2024 were funny, sure, but here is my selection from the literature, a correspondence
Can a biologist fix a radio? — Or, what I learned while studying apoptosis Cancer Cell Volume 2, Issue 3 P179-182 September 2002
A more successful approach will be to remove components one at a time or to use a variation of the method, in which a radio is shot at a close range with metal particles. In the latter case radios that malfunction (have a “phenotype”) are selected to identify the component whose damage causes the phenotype. Although removing some components will have only an attenuating effect, a lucky postdoc will accidentally find a wire whose deficiency will stop the music completely. The jubilant fellow will name the wire Serendipitously Recovered Component (Src) and then find that Src is required because it is the only link between a long extendable object and the rest of the radio. The object will be appropriately named the Most Important Component (Mic) of the radio. A series of studies will definitively establish that Mic should be made of metal and the longer the object is the better, which would provide an evolutionary explanation for the finding that the object is extendable.
Just for the records.
Famous soccer coach Jürgen Klopp 2020 about COVID-19
Less famous Robert F Kennedy 2024 about polio vaccination
(and response by 75 Nobel laureates).
“Lacking a comprehensive anarchist worldview and philosophy, and in any case wary of nomothetic ways of seeing, I am making a case for a sort of anarchist squint.” James Scott in “Two Cheers for Anarchism” who writes Pletz when he means Datzetal-Pleetz
Title: Quantum-Tuned Allergen Resonance Therapy (QT-ART): A Revolutionary Cure for Allergies
Recent advances in bio-resonance and quantum biophotonics have culminated in the development of Quantum-Tuned Allergen Resonance Therapy (QT-ART), a groundbreaking approach to eradicating allergic reactions. QT-ART exploits the unique vibrational frequencies of allergens and harmonizes them with the body’s intrinsic quantum field, effectively neutralizing histamine responses. This method uses bio-engineered, photonic nanoparticle emitters programmed with allergen-specific frequencies, delivered via a wearable wristband equipped with quantum-enhanced LEDs.
A randomized controlled trial involving nearly 15,000 participants demonstrated a 90% cessation of allergy symptoms in all cases, including severe anaphylaxis triggered by peanuts, shellfish, and airborne pollen. Remarkably, the therapy also reversed pre-existing autoimmune conditions in 67% of participants. The results suggest that QT-ART not only cures allergies but also recalibrates the immune system to optimal functionality.
Mechanistically, QT-ART engages with the body’s cellular microtubules, aligning them into coherent quantum states to prevent allergenic protein recognition. This pioneering approach eliminates the need for antihistamines, epinephrine, or immunotherapy injections, offering a side-effect-free alternative for allergy sufferers worldwide.
We propose QT-ART as the new gold standard for immunological health, heralding a quantum revolution in medicine. Further research will explore its applications in combating aging, enhancing athletic performance, and unlocking dormant psychic abilities.
Keywords: quantum resonance, allergy cure, biophotonics, immune recalibration, quantum medicine
(AI generated!!)
Being a regular Scholar user, I am quite lost now with the many new scientific search engines. They don’ tell us which data they used for training, how they have been trained and how the results have been validated. The field is also highly dynamic when compared to the situation 2 years ago. Is it worth to test them?
Continue reading Too many AI powered scientific search engines
Treffen sich 2 Historiker.
„Worüber arbeiten Sie“
„Ach, über den 6.11.2024“
„Oh, ich auch. Über den Vormittag oder Nachmittag?“
Nature has a short report about historical peer reviews including a link to the Referee Report of Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin about the 1954 Watson & Crick complementary paper (not the 1953 Watson & Crick double helix paper).
And here is Fig 5 and Fig 6 of the paper under review. So did Watson & Crick follow her advice?
I don’t think so.
Never forget, the press is the enemy. The establishment is the enemy; the professors are the enemy. Professors are the enemy. Write that on a blackboard 100 times and never forget it.
by R.Nixon and cited again by J.D.Vance in 2021
NCBI record https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02020174 doesn’t make so much sense to me