We feel good

If you are writing some kind of online diary your mood is already surveilled by wefeelfine.

However, if you are an allergic patient, you may be interested in a new project of the German Pollenstiftung that runs an online pollen diary. We have pollen counts for a long time but we do not know so much about thresholds and individual variation.
Continue reading We feel good

Internet neutrality

A new Science paper is worried about internet neutrality:

… Researchers who support “network neutrality” have become worried that the Internet may lose its innovative edge. They are concerned that control could be shifting from the edges of the Internet toward the service providers at the center, which would allow the providers to have “gatekeeper” capacity and would contradict the Internet’s “end-to-end” principle . This core tenet states that control over information flows should take place, to the extent possible, at the end points of the network…

While politicians are still debating on that issue, Continue reading Internet neutrality

Mere exposure effect, peppermints and your next experiment

Only recently I learned about the “mere exposure” effect (author’s website) / paper)

Participants named landmarks shown on photographs. In two experimental conditions, the photographs also unobtrusively showed posters depicting the logo of either a lemon candy or a peppermint candy; in a control condition, no posters were shown. Later participants could choose between the two products as a reward. Participants who had been exposed to the lemon logo and control participants chose the lemon candy more frequently, whereas for participants who had been exposed to the peppermint logo, this preference reversed: they chose the peppermint candy more frequently.

I think that’s a great study. I am wondering, however, about the impact on current science. Continue reading Mere exposure effect, peppermints and your next experiment

Vanish

Finally, here is a technical solution to a proposal that I made here earlier

Ok, we are aware that recovery is always possible with cut & paste into other applications or printing a text -so we may better think about some watermarked graphics. “Don’t ever say anything on e-mail or text messaging that you don’t want to come back and bite you.”

Attention grabbing headlines

NI has an editorial on hyping research

Although these attention-grabbing headlines might help sell papers and increase traffic to newspaper websites, such reporting is irresponsible to the public and to science in general. Even if the article itself is more balanced, it must be remembered that many readers never get much beyond the headline. The net result is the public comes away with much misinformation.

Continue reading Attention grabbing headlines

Sequence, sequence, sequence it

Here is another reference to an earlier paper

Although a disease can be causally genetic, intensified mapping efforts have so far been unable to identify genes that account for more than a small fraction of the familial risk, perhaps because the responsible variation arises by somatic mutation Continue reading Sequence, sequence, sequence it

Selfish gene – bad weeds grow tall

None of us, I think, in the mid-’70s, when “The Selfish Gene” was published, would have thought we’d be devoting so much mental space now to confront religion. We thought that matter had long been closed

is a commentary from Edge 294. Although even more British colleagues were dedicating chapters to that Dawkins meme I always found it stupid difficult to materialize a DNA regulatory unit by a personality trait – introducing another “Darwinian fairytale” (Stove). Continue reading Selfish gene – bad weeds grow tall