All posts by admin
Our data are being sold
We are being spied on and the data are being sold.

https://x.com/RuthieClems/status/1813478033975623697Report by The Chronicle
The two reports note that Informa will explore how AI can make its internal operations more effective, specifically through Copilot, Microsoft's AI assistant. "Like many, we are exploring new applications that will improve research and make it easier to analyze data, generate hypotheses, automate tasks, work across disciplines, and research ideas," a Taylor & Francis spokesperson wrote in an email to The Chronicle.
Publishers neither analyze data, generate hypotheses and work on research ideas – it is just a money making scheme after the
Another publisher, Wiley, also recently agreed to sell academic content to a tech company for training AI models. The publisher completed a "GenAI content rights project" with an undisclosed "large tech company," according to a quarterly earnings report released at the end of June.
Ăberwachung von Wissenschaftlern
Linksammlung
[Third-Party-Tracking bei Wiley und Springer. Analyse und Ausblick](bookends://sonnysoftware.com/ref/main/306385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2022-0017)
[Datentracking in der Wissenschaft: Aggregation und Verwendung bzw. Verkauf von Nutzungsdaten durch Wissenschaftsverlage](bookends://sonnysoftware.com/ref/main/30623 https://www.o-bib.de/bib/article/view/5796)
[Das Lesen der Anderen
Die Auswirkungen von User Tracking auf Bibliotheken](bookends://sonnysoftware.com/ref/main/179056 https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/5797)
[Stark-Watzinger warnt vor Spionage](https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/stark-watzinger-spionage-china-100.html)
[Wie DatenhÀndler Deutschlands Sicherheit gefÀhrden](https://netzpolitik.org/2024/databroker-files-wie-datenhaendler-deutschlands-sicherheit-gefaehrden)
[Wohnort, Arbeit, ausspioniert](https://interaktiv.br.de/ausspioniert-mit-standortdaten)
Florence Nightingale ĂŒber Statistik

mit interessanten Details zu ihrem Rose Diagramm auf historyofinformation.com
In 1858 nurse, statistician, and reformer Florence Nightingale published “Notes on Matters Affecting the Health, Efficiency, and Hospital Administration of the British Army”. … This privately printed work contained a color statistical graphic entitled “Diagram of the Causes of Mortality in the Army of the EastOffsite Link” which showed that epidemic disease, which was responsible for more British deaths in the course of the Crimean War.

Denial of Peer Review Attack
Lior Pachter created a new expression in response to Elisabeth Bik who complained about a new Nature paper with 45 supplements. Who can peer review or just read and digest this?


Publish houses of bricks not mansions of straw
Scopus is broken
was the recent title of a Retraction Watch essay
the problems with the Scopus journal rankings, however, run much deeper. The issue is not that inflated citation numbers have occasionally propelled impostor journals to the top of the list. Rather, at least in my own field of literary studies, the ranking makes no sense whatsoever.
I can confirm that also the h-index calculation is wrong when looking up my own account – showing 68 instead of 82.


Wo immer Ethik gepredigt wird, liegt die Moral im Argen
Rechtzeitig zur Olympiade kommt eine ARD Dokumentation zu Doping, der kriminellen AbkĂŒrzung zu Ruhm und Ehre.
Irgendwie erinnert die SZ Filmbesprechung daran, wie aktuell Betrug in der Wissenschaft gehandhabt wird:
AusfĂŒhrlich zu Wort kommt im Film der spanische Blutpanscher Eufemiano Fuentes, ein verurteilter Superdoper, dessen Dienste das Vaterland bereits in den Achtzigerjahren diskret anwarb. SportĂ€rzte verstehen was von Muskeln und Gelenken, GynĂ€kologen wie Fuentes was von Blut und Hormonen…Anfragen der Rechercheure zu Fuentes' Aussagen lieĂen alle Betroffenen unbeantwortet. Gewagt sei aber die Prognose: Bei den Spielen, die in keinem Halbsatz ohne Floskeln zu Fairness, Ethik und Erziehung auskommen, wird die Causa totgeschwiegen.
Wo immer Ethik gepredigt wird, liegt die Moral im Argen.
The long shadow on Eysenck
Twitter integration has been suspended by WordPress after renaming to X … but here is an announcement as screenshot

Program at https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/open-research-summer-school-tickets-910343470827
Unforgotten the testimony of Eysenck’s peer Grossarth-Maticek in Heidelberg
Science relies on controversy. Disagreement is part of research, solid consensus is overturned, celebrated researchers enter shady territory. Most of the time, this proceeds more or less smoothly, without all too much of an outcry. Most of the time…
SĂŒdhof Case
There is a new video explaining the case
The PubPeer drama and the defense is at SĂŒdhof Website.
I added some comments at the PubPeer thread above regarding scientific integrity, compression artifacts, stiching bugs, corner cloning and other paltry excuses.
Post publication peer review is a serious and apparently necessary enterprise. Forensic image analysis is a scientific discipline like molecular biology – see Sencar et al, Beck, Miura et al. for this. Following the ground breaking work of Bik, Bucci and other image analysis experts it is now an integral part of scientific integrity studies. I would therefore hesitate to dismiss identical background areas as “Dr Bik’s A.I.-powered software”. Image duplication software is not even AI powered as it uses rather conventional techniques and can even be verified by the naked eye. Low quality scanner and poor cameras are also not leading to the observation above. Text recognition (Xerox bug) as discussed by #19 is not involved here, neither is this the Thermo Fisher quantification bug nor is this a new case of corner cloning by the publisher. Funny other excuses at PP in similar cases are artefacts by sandwich impressions of other membranes, fingerprints & dirt traces, pen artefacts and explanations like “the scanner mixed up a double exposure””, “we could scan only smaller areas and made an error when pasting pieces together”.
Here are the inks to
– Nikon stitching bug
– Xerox text recognition bug
– Thermo Fisher quantification bug
– corner cloning type 1 (label exchange?), type 2 (scale exchange?) and type 3 (rotational cut?)
It’s a pain, Stanford has the knowledge while this does not prevent msiconduct.
How to ruin yourself
Found at futirism.com
Google researchers have come out with a new paper that warns that generative AI is ruining vast swaths of the internet with fake content - which is painfully ironic because Google has been hard at work pushing the same technology to its enormous user base.
The study, a yet-to-be-peer-reviewed paper spotted by 404 Media, found that the great majority of generative AI users are harnessing the tech to “blur the lines between authenticity and deception” by posting fake or doctored AI content, such as images or videos, on the internet. The researchers also pored over previously published research on generative AI and around 200 news articles reporting on generative AI misuse.
The authors painfully collected 200 observed incidents of misuse reported between January 2023 and March 2024 and find
– Manipulation of human likeness and falsification of evidence underlie the most prevalent tactics in real-world cases of misuse…
– The majority of reported cases of misuse do not consist of technologically sophisticated uses … requiring minimal technical expertise.
– The increased sophistication, availability and accessibility of GenAI tools seemingly introduces new and lower-level forms of misuse that are neither overtly malicious nor explicitly violate these tools' terms of services, but still have concerning ethical ramifications.
Ethikrat vor Auflösung?
Das DĂ schreibt ĂŒber die “HĂ€ngepartie fĂŒr den Deutschen Ethikrat”
Der Deutsche Ethikrat bleibt vorerst arbeitsunfĂ€hig. … Entsprechend des Ethikratgesetzes muss die HĂ€lfte der normalerweise 26 Ratsmitglieder von der BundesreÂgierung vorgeschlagen werden, die andere HĂ€lfte vom Parlament. … Momentan sind lediglich vier Mitglieder im Ethikrat verblieben, deren Amtszeit noch nicht beendet ist: die Theologin Elisabeth GrĂ€b-Schmidt, der Physiker Armin Grunwald, der Bioethiker und Philosoph Mark Schweda und die Philosophin und IT-Expertin Judith Simon. Ihnen gehe jetzt Arbeitszeit verloren, so Vetter. Da es bis zur Neuberufung des Rates keine Sitzungen gebe, mĂŒssten sie untĂ€tig warten, bis ihre neuen Kolleginnen und Kollegen berufen seien.
Ich fĂŒrchte, weder Bundesregierung noch Parlament hat allzu groĂes Interesse mehr an den Stellungnahmen, die oft reichlich apodiktisch herkamen und – trotz oder wegen des akademischem Backgrounds nahezu aller Mitglieder/innen – nicht immer so qualifiziert waren wie man:frau sich das gewĂŒnscht hĂ€tte. Statt mehr externe Experten einzubinden, gab es unzĂ€hlige PR AlleingĂ€nge der Vorsitzenden [vgl Dabrock, Buyx, u.v.a.m.]. Der Ethikrat steht sicher nicht vor der Auflösung – er ist immerhin gesetzlich legitimiert – aber als Gremium hat er an Bedeutung verloren.
Der Mailverkehr des BMBF
(Linksammlung)
Die geleakten NDR Mails auf
https://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/download1200.pdf
Alle Frag Den Staat Emails auf
https://fragdenstaat.de/dokumente/248126-pruefbitte-bmbf-offener-brief/
Was 3329 Hochschulangehörige dazu meinen
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSccTcNVPTUSpezw2v7wWgNVpoFPfYsYMa9QpLkmCaq4YWy1Nw/viewform
Was WissenschaftsfunktionÀre dazu sagen
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/stark-watzinger-will-mit-hochschullehrern-reden-krisengespraech-zum-bmbf-19803153.html
Die offenen Fragen stehen auf dem Wiarda Blog
https://www.jmwiarda.de/2024/06/27/und-jetzt
Der Antrag auf einstweilige VerfĂŒgung von Frag den Staat, dem stattgegeben wurde.
Die entlassene Ex StaatssekretĂ€rin will reden – der “PrĂŒfauftrag” passt nicht so recht zu Ihrem Interview vom Mai zur Freiheit der Wissenschaft . Der BMBF Link dazu geht aber nun ins Leere.
Es gibt aber auch noch ein frĂŒheres DFG Youtube Video von ihr sowie ein neues ZEIT Interview. Der neue StaatssekretĂ€r ist auch nicht viel besser wenn er uns als “verwirrte Gestalten” bezeichnet.
Update auf dem Wiarda Blog “Jetzt mĂŒssen SPD und GrĂŒne Farbe bekennen”, Deadline ist der 20.8.2024.
Successful methods
Why was the Cambridge's Laboratory of Molecular Biology so successful?
It was not by increasing administrative staff or new programme oriented funding research as many German research managers believe. It was by scientific (not primarily cultural) diversity
The LMB sets a coherent culture by promoting scientific diversity among its staff, encouraging the exchange of knowledge and ideas and valuing scientific synergies between different areas of research… It encourages the recruitment of groups with diverse but aligned interests that are complementary.
What did we do instead in Germany? We increased competition among groups and develop more hierarchical structures while the LMB is
promoting shared values and common aims helps researchers to feel part of the LMB community and proud to belong to it, fostering long-term loyalty. The LMB has always had a non-hierarchical structure - one in which emphasis lies in the quality of the argument, rather than in the status of the proponent.
So, indeed the incentives are different… While we laudate the number of external EU grants a group leader has been securing, LMB does the opposite
… resources are allocated in ways that encourage innovative collaboration between internal teams and divisions. For example, limits are set for research groups to bid for external grants, because these tend to have short-term, results-oriented requirements that might not align with the LMB's longer-term ambitions.
A legend
I also went to Camden Square last week in London – Amy Winehouse is unforgotten.

best concert ever
the legacy
the price of fame
an untold story
Retired is a terrible word, let's call it graduated