All posts by admin

Pitbull reviewer

Virginia Walbot “Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts?”

Who hasn’t reacted with shock to a devastatingly negative review of a manuscript representing years of work by graduate students and postdoctoral fellows on a difficult, unsolved question? … dismissing the years of labor and stating that the manuscript can only be reconsidered with substantially more data providing definitive proof of each claim. … Your manuscript is declined, with encouragement to resubmit when new data are added.
I confess. I’m partly responsible for training the pit-bull reviewer, and I bet you are too.

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 10.11.2025

How to push the impact of 2,299 scientists with 8,000 citations each?

Answer: Be co-author of an autophagy guideline

this is another episode of guidelines paper. More participants listed here – Affiliations listed stopped at 2299 – this means that there are 2299 authors in the manuscript. Unbelievable – how did they manage to get a consensus on what is written. May the first author explain, how the authorship on this guidelines is decided?

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 10.11.2025

Face à Gaïa

 

Bruno Latour (* 22. Juni 1947 in Beaune; † 9. Oktober 2022 in Paris)

Jonas Salk in the foreword of “Laboratory Life – the Construction of Scientific Facts” 1986:

Scientists often have an aversion to what nonscientists say about science. Scientific criticism by nonscientists is not practiced in the same way as literary criticism by those who are not novelists or poets …  A love-hate relationship exists toward scientists in some segments of society. This is evident in accounts that deal with facets ranging from tremendously high expectations of scientific studies to their cost and their dangers—all of which ignore the content and process of scientific work itself …  For myself, it was interesting to have Bruno Latour in our institute, which allowed him to carry out the first investigation of this kind of which I am aware…

“Laboratory Life” focuses on the question how the objects of scientific study are socially constructed within the laboratory where they enter a “cycle of credibility” by accumulating recognition, honors, funding and prestige. But is there any truth or is this just a scientific culture remains an open question.

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 10.11.2025

Das gemeinsame wissenschaftliche Ethos

Lesenswert!

https://www.bpb.de/system/files/dokument_pdf/APuZ_2021-46_online_0.pdf
[Es ist … ] unbestreitbar, dass ein gemeinsames wissenschaftliches Ethos und eine geteilte akademische Kultur die Grundlage für die Möglichkeit und den Bestand von epistemischen Freiräumen bilden. Diese Freiräume, auf die Wissenschaft angewiesen ist und die durch die Rechtsordnung allein nicht garantiert werden können, sind Räume der Gründe. Hier sind die rationalen Gütekriterien hoch, die Vorwegnahme der Gegenposition zur eigenen und deren ernsthafte Reflexion der wissenschaftliche Idealfall. Der Rede folgen gemeinhin Kritik und Gegenrede; eine sachbezogene Beharrlichkeit (statt Ablenkung, Themenwechsel, bullshitting) ist der diskursive Standard. Daher ist die „große Gereiztheit“, die Teile der aktuellen Debatte um Wissenschaftsfreiheit charakterisiert, der Wissenschaft wesensfremd, ebenso wie antagonistische Selbstverortungen (links vs. rechts, wokevs. boomer, Freunde vs. Feinde der Wissenschaft).

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 10.11.2025

The slow abandonment of the academic mindset

Mittelman  on the  “The World-Class University and Repurposing Higher Education” 2018:

… the central academic purposes of the university are imperiled. While not universally adopted, they began to take root in the nineteenth century, developed gradually in the nineteenth and twentieth, and encounter novel tensions in the twenty-first. In this century, the triad of core educational missions in nonauthoritarian societies—cultivating democratic citizenship, fostering critical thinking, and protecting academic freedom — is losing footing. A new form of utilitarianism is gaining ground. It prioritizes useful knowledge and problem-solving skills at the expense of basic inquiry…

A few pages later Mittelman notices that universities

… have become preoccupied with strategic planning, benchmarking, branding, visibility, rankings, productivity indices, quality assurance systems, students as customers, and measurable outcomes. Before the 1980s, members of the higher education community rarely expressed themselves in these terms.

And it is true – we have been struggling even after 1980 with the mysteries of nature, by designing experiments and studies, trying to make new discoveries and teaching them to our students.

Fast rewind to the “idea of  a university” and the “cultivated intellect” by John Henry Newman (p15) and the usefulness of useless knowledge  of Abraham Flexner. In the last century clearly a need for unanticipated outcome was felt while today basically every research program starts with  a lengthy introduction that this is the most important research because disease D is so frequent or technology T is so important for the environment. Mittelman quotes Daniel Zajfman, 10th president of Israel’s Weizmann Institute, when talking about university rankings

When we look at the values of knowledge for the sake of knowledge, we realise 100 years later what we can do with this. If you look at the history of science, you will find that most of the discoveries were never made by trying to solve a problem, rather by trying to understand how nature works, so our focus is on understanding.

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 10.11.2025

Ein mathematischer Gottesbeweis

Ein mathematischer Gottesbeweis geht zurück auf Guido Grandi und  wurde vor kurzem wieder mal ausgegraben von u/Prunestand bzw Cliff Pickover.

0 = 0 + 0 + 0 + ...
  = (1-1) + (1-1) + (1-1) + ...
  = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + ...
  = 1 + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + ...
  = 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + ...
  = 1

was letztendlich einer Schöpfung aus dem Nichts entspricht wo doch eigentlich “nihilo ex nihilum” gilt.

Die Grandi-Reihe hat nur leider keinen Summenwert, weil sie nicht konvergent ist. Anders gesagt

0 + 0 + 0 + ...                          # N Elemente
(1-1) + (1-1) + (1-1) + ...              # 2N Elemente
1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + ...              # 2N Elemente
1 + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + ... # 2N + 1 Elemente
1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + ...                      # N + 1 Elemente

dh die 4. Zeile enthält eine falsche Aussage.

Frustriert oder erleichtert? Auf arXiv geht es weiter mit Gödels Gottesbeweis.

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 10.11.2025

Glenn Gould 1958

  Continue reading Glenn Gould 1958

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 10.11.2025

increasing complication

Another famous article from the past: P. W. Anderson “More is different” 50 years ago

… the next stage could be hierarchy or specialization of function, or both. At some point we have to stop talking about decreasing symmetry and start calling it increasing complication. Thus, with increasing complication at each stage, we go up on the hierarchy of the sciences. We expect to encounter fascinating and, I believe, very fundamental questions at each stage in fitting together less complicated pieces into a more complicated system and understanding the basically new types of behavior which can result.

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 10.11.2025

Glad to help

Raspberry Pis are small single-board computers. As I have two of these devices already up and logging solar power production on my roof they could do even more: They are not only supporting a green environment but can also help people from countries with repressive governments by installation of another software package.

Snowflake is a system to defeat internet censorship. People who are censored can use Snowflake to access the internet. Their connection goes through Snowflake proxies, which are run by volunteers.

https://www.wjst.de/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/FdWznhmXgAMwDgO-1.png

Setup takes only 2 minutes – full instructions are at kuketz-blog.de

# sudo apt-get install git
# sudo apt-get install golang
git clone https://git.torproject.org/pluggable-transports/snowflake.git
cd snowflake/proxy
go build
nohup /home/pi/snowflake/proxy/proxy > /home/pi/www/snowflake.log 2>&1 &;

and this is the result

2022/09/25 17:44:19 In the last 1h0m0s, there were 16 connections. Traffic Relayed ↑ 33 MB, @ 5 MB.
2022/09/25 18:44:19 In the last 1h0m0s, there were 27 connections. Traffic Relayed ↑ 170 MB, @ 48 MB.
2022/09/25 19:44:19 In the last 1h0m0s, there were 11 connections. Traffic Relayed ↑ 61 MB, @ 28 MB.
2022/09/25 20:44:19 In the last 1h0m0s, there were 19 connections. Traffic Relayed ↑ 90 MB, @ 27 MB.
2022/09/25 21:44:19 In the last 1h0m0s, there were 10 connections. Traffic Relayed ↑ 41 MB, @ 12 MB.
...

 

CC-BY-NC Science Surf accessed 10.11.2025