At least one positive advice?

Is there at least one positive advice of all that Musk utterance?

https://archive.ph/TcxaF#selection-1319.0-2987.210
  1.  Avoid large meetings
    Large meetings waste valuable time and energy – They discourage debate – People are more guarded than open – There’s not enough time for everyone to contribute. Don’t schedule large meetings unless you’re certain they provide value to everyone.
  2. Leave a meeting if you’re not contributing
    If a meeting doesn’t require your: – Input – Value – Decisions Your presence is useless. It’s not rude to leave a meeting. But it’s rude to waste people’s time.
  3. Forget the chain of command
    Communicate with colleagues directly. Not through supervisors or managers. Fast communicators make fast decisions. Fast decisions = competitive advantage.
  4.  Be clear, not clever
    Avoid nonsense words and technical jargon. It slows down communication. Choose words that are: – Concise – To the point – Easy to understand Don’t sound smart. Be efficient.
  5. Ditch frequent meetings
    There’s no better way to waste everyone’s time. Use meetings to: – Collaborate – Attack issues head-on – Solve urgent problems But once you resolve the issue, frequent meetings are no longer necessary. You can resolve most issues without a meeting. Instead of meetings: – Send a text – Send an email – Communicate on a discord or slack channel Don’t interrupt your team’s workflow if it’s unnecessary.
  6. Use common sense if a company rule doesn’t make sense
    Contribute to progress – Apply to your specific situation Avoid following the rule with your eyes closed. Don’t follow rules. Follow principles.

Warning : 2) and even other x) only suitable for slightly autistic, self obsessed and excellent scientists.

 

 


CC-BY-NC

Brave new AI science world

AI works well in some areas while results are very mixed or even dangerous in others [1, 2].

But what about AI in generic scientific areas?

I have recently looked at scite.ai, a service that claims to analyze a paper if the references have been supported or contrasted the findings — any references that have been retracted in the meantime or received an expression of concern? While the latter isn’t really a big question, I was not very much impressed by the results as most references could not be classified.

But there are now more companies off the ground. Let’s have a look at some.

One is SciScore

16/11/2022 screenshot https://sciscore.com/index.php#pricing

SciScore claims

SciScore generates three reports and a score for every submission. These materials assist researchers, editors, and funders in improving the quality and reliability of scientific research by automatically reporting detected criteria of interest for future review. Researchers signing up with their ORCID get ten free reports. Reports can take as little as 1 minute!

The next one is Prophy, another reference finder.

16/11/2022 screenshot https://www.prophy.science/

and there is Galactica.

16/11/2022 screenshot https://galactica.org/

and well also copy.ai

28/12/2022 Screenshot https://copy.ai

I have no idea if we really need this kind of stuff – any AI to write my blog even faster?

Also others commented earlier this month that it is “not obviously wrong but wrong in subtle ways”.

28/12/22 Screenshot https://mastodon.social/@tommorris/109460645976102033

Fortunately Copyleaks released now even an AI detector just to fight back…


CC-BY-NC

No irony allowed

Ronagh & Souder in “The ethics of ironic science

We adopt the concept of irony from the fields of literary and rhetorical criticism to detect, characterize, and analyze the interpretations in the more than 60 published research papers that cite an instance of ironic science. We find a variety of interpretations: some citing authors interpret the research as valid and accept it, some contradict or reject it, and some acknowledge its ironic nature.

bonus example 61 “Effect on human longevity of added dietary chocolate


CC-BY-NC

Es gelingt so selten jemand an die richtige Stelle zu bringen

Albert Einstein in einem Brief an Paul Epstein


CC-BY-NC

Does identification of misconduct in studies affect medical guidelines?

This question has been answered by an earlier study of Avenell et al.

By 2016 the affected trial reports were cited in 1158 publications, including 68 systematic reviews, meta-analyses, narrative reviews, guidelines and clinical trials. We judged that 13 guidelines, systematic or other reviews would likely change their findings if the affected trial reports were removed, and in another eight it was unclear if findings would change. By 2018, only one of the 68 citing publications, a systematic review, appeared to have undertaken a reassessment, which led to a correction.
We found evidence that this group of affected trial reports distorted the evidence base. Correction of these distortions is slow, uncoordinated and inconsistent. Unless there is a rapid, systematic, coordinated approach by bibliographic databases, authors, journals and publishers to mitigate the impact of known cases of research misconduct, patients, other researchers and their funders may continue to be adversely affected.


CC-BY-NC

Unsent tweets, fake tweets, true facts

A legendary tale of the dying Twitter imperium

https://twitter.com/rafaelshimunov/status/1591133819918114816

And well, parody everywhere…

https://twitter.com/masonporter/status/1591303248019091457

CC-BY-NC

Eine illustrierte Geschichte des gsf/Helmholtz Forschungszentrums München

(in öffentlich zugänglichen Originaldokumenten)

https://www.base.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/BASE/DE/berichte/kt/kernanlagen-betrieb.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=12

In Neuherberg stand ein TRIGA Mark III, in Mainz bei Fritz Straßmann, dem Mitentdecker der Kernspaltung, ein TRIGA Mark II.

https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/SupplementaryMaterials/D482/LatinAmericaAndTheCaribbean.pdf
https://www.bge.de/de/asse/kurzinformationen/geschichte-der-schachtanlage-asse-ii/
https://www.zeit.de/2009/44/Helmholtz
Die Interessen des Geschäftsführers Günther Wess https://www.helmholtz.de/newsroom/artikel/guenther-wess-ueber-kunst-und-wissenschaft
https://archiv.bge.de/archiv/www.asse-archiv.de/en/asse-archiv/asse-newsarchiv/news-detail/article/11193/5708/index.html
https://doris.bfs.de/jspui/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:0221-2009082116/1/BfS_2009_Endlager_Asse_II_BfS-18-09.pdf
https://www.enargus.de/pub/bscw.cgi/?op=enargus.eps2&q=GSF%20-%20Forschungszentrum%20f%c3%bcr%20Umwelt%20und%20Gesundheit%20GmbH%20-%20Institut%20f%c3%bcr%20Tieflagerung%20(IfT)&m=1&v=10&s=8
https://archiv.bge.de/archiv/www.asse.bund.de/Asse/DE/themen/was-wird/was-wird_node.html
Wissenschaft also Alibi https://www.fraktion.gruene-niedersachsen.de/fileadmin/docs/fraktion/infopakete/Asse_Abschlussbericht-PUA_21.pdf
https://archiv.bge.de/archiv/www.asse-archiv.de/asse-archiv/wir-ueber-uns/index.html
https://www.greenpeace.de/klimaschutz/energiewende/atomausstieg/asse-ii-endlager-gau
https://www.greenpeace.de/klimaschutz/energiewende/atomausstieg/asse-ii-endlager-gau

Das Ende der Endlagerung

https://www.noell.bilfinger.com/aktuelles/fachpresse/meldungen-detail/news/bilfinger-noell-intensiviert-unterstuetzung-zur-bergung-radioaktiver-abfaelle-aus-schachtanlage-asse-ii/

4,7 Milliarden Kosten

https://www.bge.de/de/asse/
https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/asse-in-niedersachsen-wie-wasser-alle-hoffnungen-im-atommuelllager-zerstoert-a-df9abd9f-a460-432d-a863-4598db9fc213
https://www.zeit.de/2024/23/atommuelllager-asse-wasser-radioaktivitaet-peter-hocke
https://www.zeit.de/2024/24/atommuelllager-asse-strahlung-schacht-wasser
https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/asse-in-niedersachsen-wie-wasser-alle-hoffnungen-im-atommuelllager-zerstoert-a-df9abd9f-a460-432d-a863-4598db9fc213
https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/braunschweig_harz_goettingen/Atommuelllager-Asse-Einsickerndes-Wasser-nimmt-neue-Wege,asse1650.html
https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/braunschweig_harz_goettingen/asse-betreiber-stellen-ersten-antrag-zur-bergung-des-atommuells,asse-108.html

CC-BY-NC

Querdenken

Es gibt bisher wenig gute Erklärungen der Querdenken Bewegung.

Warum verfallen Menschen auf bestimmte  Meinungen? Und was unterscheidet sie zum Beispiel von den wahnhaften Störungen in der Psychiatrie oder aber auch von Fehlschlüssen in der Wissenschaft? Irgendwie scheint sich doch alles auf einem Kontinuum zu bewegen?

Bei dem Versuch einer Antwort folge ich dabei mehr oder weniger dem Psychiater Manfred Lütz, der auch nicht viel auf unsere psychiatrischen Diagnosen gibt, da sie nur Hilfskonstruktionen sind die nur einem Zweck dienen, nämlich Menschen medizinisch zu helfen (S.32ff)

Manfred Lütz. Irre! – Wir behandeln die Falschen: Unser Problem sind die Normalen. Goldmann 2019.

Unbestrittenes Kennzeichen des Wahns ist jedenfalls die Unfähigkeit, die Perspektive zu wechseln.  Mit dieser Definition gelingen nun auch die Unterscheidungen: So sind Psychotiker und Querdenker beide unfähig, die Perspektive zu wechseln, während das den meisten Wissenschaftlern aber möglich sein sollte.

Psychotiker leiden unter dieser Unfähigkeit (zumindest im symptomfreien Intervall) während Querdenker darüber in ihrer Gemeinschaftserfahrung Bestätigung erfahren. Die “self enforcing loops” bei der Psychose sind wohl hirnorganisch  bedingt, während sie bei Querdenker eher sekundär und erlebnisreaktiv sind. Die Ideenwelt der Psychose ist kreativ, während Querdenker kaum zu neuen oder innovative Ideen in der Lage sind.

Dennoch: Querdenken sollte  nicht pathologisiert werden – Labels helfen nicht, sie verstärken nur eher den Zusammenhalt der Gruppe. Mit Wegfall von Youtube und Telegram würde die Bewegung wohl in sich zusammen fallen. Da dies nicht passierte, sucht sie sich neue Ziele etwa Russland.

Im selbst gewählten Asyl ist es dann aber mit dem Gemeinschaftserlebnis vorbei, so auch bei den zwei prominentesten Ärzteaccounts diese Woche zu sehen.

Bodo Schiffmann https://twitter.com/Tzerberus1/status/1589185591127977984
Carola Javid Kistel https://twitter.com/Alemanniel/status/1589318971769196551

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


CC-BY-NC

Katzenjammer II

Seltsam, was gerade auf Twitter los ist wenn wir CT Bergstrom glauben, der eine Team Email von Musk geteilt hat.

putative chief twit email as distributed by CT Bergstrom https://archive.ph/ZNWIN

Es sieht so aus als sei Twitter nun in der Gewalt von einem reichen Mann, der einem pseudoreligiösen Mars Kult angehört – nachzulesen in dem aufschlussreichen Artikel von Dave Troy

This is a reference to “longtermism” the heavily marketed philosophy being promoted by Musk and his friend William MacAskill that asserts the only thing that matters is humanity’s future in space, and that the only goal of the living is to maximize the number of future humans alive, as well as the number of artificial intelligence instances that could possibly exist in the future. This mandate is most often used to brush aside calls for improving conditions and alleviating suffering among the living here on Earth now. Because, the theory goes, giving a poor person a blanket isn’t likely to be as useful for the future of humanity as building a rocket to Mars. Longtermism is heavily influenced by “Russian Cosmism” and is also directly adjacent to “Effective Altruism.” Musk’s stated mission, which he intends to fulfill in his lifetime, is to “make humanity a multiplanetary species.” The anti-democratic urge in longtermism is rooted in the belief that “mob rule” will lead to nuclear annihilation; we should, Musk thinks, be guided by “wiser” minds.

 

 

 


CC-BY-NC

Pharma (and often also academic) research doesn’t match public health needs

https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/life%20sciences/our%20insights/the%20helix%20report%20is%20biopharma%20wired%20for%20future%20success/helix-rewiring-the-dna-for-the-next-wave-of-impact-in-biopharma.pdf?shouldIndex=false

There is also a review in the BMJ “Can medical product development be better aligned with global needs?

Typically, market analyses are performed by pharmaceutical companies. These analyses lead to value propositions and business cases for developing new products based on technologies those companies have either developed, or for which they have licensed intellectual property. These analyses—together with assessments of “end-user” (patient) preferences, and assessments of regulatory pathways—drive research and development (R&D) investments. In traditional for-profit product R&D, the unmet medical need is factored in only partially, including through the end-user preferences and the company’s assessment of likely regulatory authority perspectives. In some cases, governments or multilateral agencies can be large scale procurers (i.e., they will purchase the product), and in this situation their preferences may be given more weight.
However, at present, only a small proportion of global health R&D spending (around 2%) is on the compelling medical problems faced by LMICs.


CC-BY-NC

Academic freedom

Peer review kann auch Wissenschaft verhindern, wie wir gestern an dem Cosmos Artikel oder vor ein paar Tagen bei eLife gesehen haben.

Und es ist ein riesiges Problem, wie ich gerade in einem weiteren Essay bei Sandra Kostner gefunden habe “Disziplinieren statt argumentieren. Zur Verhängung und Umsetzung intellektueller Lockdowns” in ApuZ 71. Jahrgang, 46/2021, 15. November 2021.

Continue reading Academic freedom


CC-BY-NC